The Eldest Daughter comes back home

 

In the New Year we have a new way of looking at Vatican Council II, which really, is the traditional old theology.

With the False Premise we have the liberal New Theology. With the Rational Premise we have the old theology. So we can choose to look at Vatican Council II with the old theology and old ecclesiology.

With the New Theology the Church says outside the Church there is known salvation (LG 16 etc). With the old theology the Council says outside the Church there is no salvation, LG 16 etc are not practical exceptions for traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). They are only hypothetical cases. So invisible people cannot be exceptions for the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors.

Vatican Council II with the old theology is missionary like St. Ignatius of Loyola, St. Robert Bellarmine and St. Francis Xavier.

We have a missionary Catholic Church. We have a Vatican Council II which calls us to be martyrs like St. Maximillian Kolbe. We can proclaim the Faith of the Ugandan and Korean martyrs. The Faith today is the same as that in the time of St. Thomas Aquinas, St. Augustine – and the English martyrs.

We must appeal to the teaching faculties at Al Azhar University, Boston College and the John Lateran University to tell Pope Francis to interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise .The Pontifical Institute for Arabic and Islamic Studies (PISAI), Rome has to get sincere. May be visiting Muslim scholars can tell them the truth.

The Council supports Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston on extra ecclesiam nulla salus. All future popes and all the present cardinals will have to be traditional.

So the German Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF), Vatican, has to be honest. He must interpret Vatican Council II traditionally and rationally. It is obligatory. He must accept Vatican Council II and he can only interpret it rationally. The Council is in harmony with Tradition. There is no rupture with the ecclesiology of St. Francis of Assisi, St. Dominic, St. Catherine of Siena, St. Bridget, St Teresa of Avila, Edith Stein, St. Maximillian Kolbe.

So, Sister Nathalie Bequart can no more say that the Synods are based upon Vatican Council II.Since the old way of looking at the Council is now the new way. The old way contradicts her and Cardinal Grech.The ecclesiology of Vatican Council II is only exclusivist. It supports the Syllabus of Errors, Quanto Conficemor Moerore and Mystici Corporis.

Cardinal Marx and Bishop Batzing cannot say that their Synodal Way is based upon the liberal theology of Vatican Council II. Since the Council does not have any liberal theology.

Bishop Libasci and Fr. Georges de Laire in New Hampshire, USA cannot threaten religious communities with a Decree of Prohibitions, if they do not follow Vatican Council II. The Council supports Brother Andre Marie micm, Prior of the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary (men), at the St. Benedict Center, Richmond, New Hampshire.

Bishop Stephen J.Lopes at the Anglican Ordinariate must know that the Council supports, not his liberalism, but the traditional theology of Fr. Vaughn Treco whom he excommunicated.

The Council supports Fr. Alessandro M. Minutella and not the bishop of Palermo, Archbishop Corrado Lorefice, who had him excommunicated.

The Council supports the young traditionalists who were expelled in Ferrara-Commacchio, Italy and not the Auxiliary bishops of the Rome Vicariate.

Cardinal Zuppi and the Secretary of the Italian Bishops Conference are in heresy and schism, according to Vatican Council II rational and traditional.

The Hungarian, Polish and Slovakian bishops’ conferences have to update their understanding of Vatican Council II.

France.

France.

France.

Imagine the future in France.

The Eldest Daughter comes back home.

There is only the ecclesiology of the Rome Missal (1223).The New Missal is based upon the Fake Premise, the false interpretation of Vatican Council II. The new moral theology, new ecumenism, new evangelization etc are based upon the false interpretation of Vatican Council II.

Vatican Council II mentioned in Traditionis Custode only supports the old Missal. There can be only one obligatory interpretation of the Council. This is the Holy Spirit.

Irrespective of who was present at the Council in in 1965 and irrespective of what was said and done there, the Council is traditional and exclusivist. It supports the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century on EENS. This is Vatican Council II. This is the only Vatican Council II. Pope Francis is only Magisterial when he interprets Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise. The cardinals, like Pope Paul VI to Francis, are not Magisterial when they interpret the Council with the False Premise. They have to choose the honest option. -Lionel Andrades