All these years the SSPX was in collusion with the Left and interpreted Vatican Council II as a rupture and not continuation with Tradition. They did not want to be considered Anti Semitic. So they did not affirm the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) on the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, with no known exceptions. Instead they were creating exceptions for the Council of Florence and the Fourth Lateran Council. Instead they were creating exceptions for these Councils, which did not mention any exceptions. They did this by interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally. They would also interpret the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance, irrationally, like the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office. So in this way they would reject Feeneyite EENS. There was a new version of EENS with exceptions, a Cushingite or Laisneyite EENS.
There is not
a single book published by the SSPX Angelus Press, which interprets LG 8, LG
14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc rationally i.e. they are hypothetical and
theoretical cases only. They exist only in our mind. They are not practical
exceptions for Feeneyite EENS.
There is no
book written by Fr. Franz Schmidberger on LG 8 etc, being only hypothetical.
Instead the books in German and French, interpret Vatican Council II
irrationally.
Fr.
Franz Schmidberger and Fr. Nicklaus Pfluger allow the German and French Bishops Conferences to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and not
rationally and they are not correcting them in public on this issue. - Lionel Andrades
APRIL 16, 2023
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment