We have a revolution in the interpretation of Vatican Council II. There is a re-interpretation. It takes the Church back to the past ecclesiology. This is a new discovery. It will come as a surprise to many. It is simple.The red is not an exception for the blue. The baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance is not an exception for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) according to the Fourth Lateran Council (1215), the Council of Florence(1442) and the Athanasius Creed. This was not known to even the traditionalists like the SSPX, CMRI,MHT, MHFM etc. They were interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally like the popes from Paul VI to Francis.

 

We have a revolution in the interpretation of Vatican Council II. There is a re-interpretation. It takes the Church back to the past ecclesiology. This is a new discovery. It will come as a surprise to many. It is simple.The red is not an exception for the blue. The baptism of desire (BOD) and being saved in invincible ignorance (I.I) are not exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) according to the Fourth Lateran Council (1215), the Council of Florence(1442) and the Athanasius Creed. They (BOD and I.I)  are only hypothetical and theoretical cases in 2023. We cannot see or meet someone saved as such.

This was not known to even the traditionalists like the SSPX, CMRI,MHT, MHFM etc. They were interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally like the popes from Paul VI to Francis.-Lionel Andrades

JULY 3, 2023

Cardinals Grech, Hollerich and Marx and Bishop Georg Batzing and Sister Nathalie Bequart are interpreting Vatican Council II with the red being an exception for the blue. This is irrational. It is nontraditional and dishonest. For me the red is not an exception for the blue : The popes from Paul VI to Francis made a mistake on Vatican Council II .

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/07/cardinals-grech-hollerich-and-marx-and.html