People would expect all the cardinals who elect a pope to be honest and to interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with only Feeneyite EENS.

 With Feeneyite instead of Cushingite theology the Catholic Church returns to the theology of the past. Now the Vatican has to come back to this theology; to the Catholic Faith. Pope Francis has to come back to the Catholic Faith. Outside the Church there is no salvation is the pre and post Vatican Council II theology. This is the Conciliar Church, Vatican Council II is Feeneyite and not Cushingite. The Creeds, Councils and Catechisms are Feeneyite i.e. they are interpreted rationally and not irrationally. LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II are Feeneyite. They refer to invisible and not visible cases in 1965-2023.

THE VATICAN HAS TO RETURN TO FEENEYISM

So with the old theology; with Feeneyism, the Vatican will be saying outside the Church there is no salvation. This will be based upon Vatican Council II (AG 7, LG 14) and the Catechism of the Catholic Church (845, 846, and 1257). The Catechism of the Catholic Church 847-848 (invincible ignorance) does not contradict CCC 845, 846, 1257.This is interpreting all the Catechisms (Trent, Pius X etc) rationally. It is Feeneyite.

Similarly LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II do not contradict Ad Gentes 7 and Lumen Gentium 14 (all need faith and baptism for salvation).This is rational. This is Feeneyism. ‘The red hypothetical Cushingite passages in Vatican Council II are not an exception for the blue, orthodox Feeneyite passages’.

RAHNER, RATZINGER AND LEFEBVRE WERE CUSHINGITE

So when a Catholic learns to interpret Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church rationally; with Feeneyism, then it is meaningless for him to read about Rahner, Ratzinger, Ottaviani and Lefebvre at Vatican Council II ( 1962-65).They were Cushingite. 

Also it is meaningless to read books today written by the Jesuits who interpreted Vatican Council and the Catechism of the Catholic Church irrationally. They are Cushingites.

FUTURE ENCYCLICALS HAVE TO BE FEENEYITE

Also the encyclicals, letters etc of the popes from Pius XII to Francis ( Redemptoris Missio, Dominus Iesus etc) are Cushingite and not Feeneyite, it can be observed.

So the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) and the Franciscans of the Immaculate (FI) no more need to be expected to accept Vatican Council II, irrational, for canonical recognition by a Vatican which is Feeneyite. The SSPX and the FI would have to accept the Council and all the Catechisms, only with Feeneyism. This is the moral choice.

Any cardinal or bishop who would still be interpreting Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church with Cushingism and not Feeneyism would be obsolete. They would no more be a break with the ecclesiology of the Doctors of the Church, St. Teresa of Avila, St. Catherine of Siena…

So the theology today of Life Site News, Church Militant TV, EWTN, Catholic World Report, National Catholic Reporter etc are meaningless for me. They are in another world.

HISTORIC TIMES

We are in an historic time. The Catholic Church is about to officially return to Tradition with Vatican Council II, finally, interpreted rationally and no more irrationally.

Pope Paul VI and Rahner, Ratzinger, Ottaviani and Lefebvre interpreted the Council irrationally but now the pope can interpret the Council rationally. Kung, Congar, Murray and Bea and the others are obsolete today.

The Council today is traditional (not a break with the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX) and Feeneyite (not a break with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) of the Fourth Lateran Council and the Council of Florence).

We follow the past Magisterium of the Church and not the Jewish Left (ADL etc).

AIRPLANE INTERVIEWS MUST BE FEENEYITE

Pope Francis must not be allowed to issue another encyclical or letter which is Cushingite. He must not grant another airplane interview with Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally and not rationally.

Before the 2025 Jubilee, Pope Francis, the cardinals and bishops must only interpret Vatican Council II rationally i.e. LG 8,14 and 16 etc, are only hypothetical cases and they are not practical exceptions for the dogma EENS, the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the Catechisms of Trent and Pius X.

So when the Left legally begins to persecute traditional Catholics in a big way,  the pope will be traditional on Vatican Council II. Archbishop Victor Manuel Fernandez would be traditional on Vatican Council II.

PEOPLE NOW KNOW THE TRUTH

The people must know that the cardinals are fooling them when they interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally and then say that the Council is a break with Tradition and so they are forced to accept this. This is a lie.

Pope Francis must no more fool the people and say that Vatican Council II is a rupture with Tradition when he knows this is not true. The pope can interpret the Council rationally in harmony with Tradition as it was known to St.Francis of Assisi, St. Catherine of Siena, St. Ignatius of Loyola, St. John of Cross, St. Maximillian Kolbe…

PAPAL ELECTORS HAVE TO BE FEENEYITE

Imagine all the cardinals in the world who will elect a new pope. They will be affirming Vatican Council II.Then imagine of all of them being honest and interpreting Vatican Council II only rationally. They are Feeneyite and no more Cushingite on Vatican Council II. We will have a traditional Church once again.

The lay people at the Synod would have to interpret Vatican Council II with LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, ,NA 2, GS 22 etc, as being only hypothetical. This is common sense. They obviously have to choose what is rational. It is ethical to not project LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, and UR 3, ete as being non-hypothetical, physically visible cases in 1965-2023.

So Pope Francis can no more justify the Abu Dhabi Declaration, Amoris Laetitia and Traditionis Custode with Vatican Council II deliberately interpreted irrationally.Since the people would know that there is a rational choice and they are all obligated to take it.They would expect all the cardinals who elect a pope to be honest and to interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with only Feeneyite EENS.

There is a Heaven and a Hell. In Heaven there are only Catholics.1  They are there with Catholic Faith and the baptism of water and without mortal sins on their soul.To be a Catholic is to be a Feeneyite.   -Lionel Andrades

1

 ( John 3:5, Mark 16:16 etc, Vatican Council II ( AG 7, LG 14), Catechism of the Catholic Church ( 845,846,1257), Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24 Q, 27Q),dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Fourth Lateran Council, Council of Florence etc), Dominus Iesus ( 20 etc), Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Notification on Fr. Jacques Dupuis sj (2001) during the pontificate of Pope John Paul II. Note: Feeneyite CCC 847-848 refer to hypothetical cases and so they do not contradict the Feeneyite CCC 845, 846, 1257.