My Parish Priest Fr. Paolo Boumis at the church Sant Agapito, Rome, is Feeneyite on extra ecclesiam nulla salus and so are the Missionaries of Charity of Mother Teresa , the Auxiliary Bishops of Rome and the theologians at the Ecclesia Mater, of the Rome Vicariate- since they all agree that LG 8,14,15,16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, in Vatican Council II refer to hypothetical cases only, they are always invisible and theoretical cases only in 2023. So they are not practical exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and neither for Ad Gentes 7, which says all need faith and baptism for salvation

 

My Parish Priest Fr. Paolo Boumis at the church Sant Agapito, Rome, is Feeneyite on extra ecclesiam nulla salus and so are the Missionaries of Charity of Mother Teresa , the Auxiliary Bishops of Rome and the theologians at the Ecclesia Mater, of the Rome Vicariate- since they all agree that LG 8,14,15,16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, in Vatican Council II refer to hypothetical cases only, they are always invisible and theoretical cases only in 2023. So they are not practical exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus  and neither for Ad Gentes 7, which says all need faith and baptism for salvation. All.

So they are saying that the orthodox passages in Vatican Council II (blue passages) support the dogma EENS according to the Fourth Lateran Council (1215), while the hypothetical, red passages, are not exceptions. So we are left with only the orthodox, pro-Feeneyite passages in Vatican Council II which have the hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition. –Lionel Andrades