The SSPX priests in their sermons must stop referring to modernists, as if, it excludes the SSPX. Since the SSPX interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and the result is modernism. There is a rupture with Tradition.

The SSPX priests in their sermons must stop referring to modernists, as if, it excludes the SSPX. Since the SSPX interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and the result is modernism. There is a rupture with Tradition.

The SSPX must also stop criticizing Rahner, Ratzinger, Balthazar, Murray and Congar and the others at Vatican Council II. Since Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre also interpreted the Council wrongly, like them- Lefebvre did not tell Pope Paul VI to interpret the Council rationally. There was no public correction from the new SSPX bishops Fellay, Mallerias, Richardson and Galaretta.

How can an SSPX bishop in public mortal sin (changing the meaning of the Creeds with the common false premise) be allowed to offer the Latin Mass?

If the SSPX calls me a Feeneyite in a pejorative sense- since it is not politically correct with the Jewish Left- I would respond by saying that Vatican Council II is Feeneyite. The Council is orthodox and traditional when LG 8, 14, 15.16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, refer to only hypothetical cases in 1965-2023.

Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church are Feeneyite. There is nothing in both of them to contradict the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus of the Council of Florence (1442) and the Fourth Lateran Council (1215).

When the popes and saints over the centuries referred to the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance, it was always to hypothetical cases only. So they were  Feeneyite on EENS.

-Lionel Andrades