Vatican Council II interpreted rationally is in harmony with Tradition for me, why is not so also for Pope Francis?

 

Is it not obligatory for Pope Francis to affirm the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, defined by three Church Councils? 

It is obligatory!

Since LG 8, 14 and 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II are always theoretical and invisible cases. So they are not examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church in 2023.They are not physically visible people saved outside the Church in 1965-2023.

They are “zero cases” says the apologist John Martignoni. They cannot be exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, wrote Archbishop Thomas E. Gullickson when I asked him about it on his blog.

So Vatican Council II with Lumen Gentium 8 etc being only hypothetical does not contradict Tradition (Syllabus of Errors, EENS etc).

Vatican Council II interpreted rationally is in harmony with Tradition for me, why is not so also for Pope Francis? - Lionel Andrades