I affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) like the Church Councils and popes.I also affirm implicit for us baptism of desire.I am affirming Vatican Council II in harmony with the dogma EENS as it was known to the 16th century missionaries.

Comments from the blogpost Pope Benedict's heretical interview to Avvenire prepares Catholics to receive a sacrilegeous Synod report after Easter

 Remnant Clergy said...

Heretical Feeney ite.

April 1, 2016 

Lionel:

I do not know what is your concept of Feeneyism and heresy.

I affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) like the Church Councils and popes.

I also affirm implicit for us baptism of desire. I accept the baptism of desire as being hypothetical and not objectively seen. This is common sense.It can only be theoretical for us, a possibility.So I am not denying the possibility of a person being saved with the baptism of desire. For me it will be followed with the baptism of water since this is the dogmatic teaching of EENS.

So I affirm the dogma EENS as it was defined by three Church Councils and I also accept being saved with the baptism of desire or blood, or in invincible ignorance.

I reject a physically visible for us baptism of desire or blood, or being saved in invincible ignorance.

Similarly I accept Vatican Council II. For me LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, AG 11 ( seeds of the Word)etc refer to hypothetical cases.They are not explicit for me.

I reject a Vatican Council II in which LG 16 etc are assumed to be visible and not invisible.

So I am affirming Vatican Council II in harmony with the dogma EENS as it was known to the 16th century missionaries.

I interpret magisterial documents with Feeneyism ( there are no known exceptions to EENS) and I reject the interpretation of magisterial documents with Cushingism ( there are known exceptions to EENS). 

So you cannot say that I am in heresy since I affirm EENS, the baptism of desire etc and Vatican Council II. I accept the Catechism of the Catholic Church interpreted with rational Feeneyism and reject an interpretation of the Catechism with irrational Cushingism.

___________________________________

For me the contemporary magisterium is a break with the pre- Counci of Trent magisterium since they interpret magisterial documents with irrational Cushingism as a theology.The centuries old magisterium did not use Cushingism.

With Cushingism Vatican Council II has a hermeneutic of discontinuity. With Feeneyism Vatican Council II has a hermeneutic of discontinuity.

The present magisterium interprets Vatican Council II with an irrationality, heresy and a break with Tradition. I am not obliged to follow when a rational, non heretical and Traditional alternative is available.

-Lionel Andrades

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/03/pope-benedicts-heretical-interview-to.html

Feeneyism according to Wikipedia : with comments

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/02/feeneyism-according-to-wikipedia-with.html

At the 'New Traditional College' will the faculty interpret magisterial documents with Feeneyism or Cushingism ?

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/02/at-new-traditional-college-will-faculty.html

The theology mentioned in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949, is meaningless and does not apply.In a way they kind of duped all of us, including me

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/01/the-theology-mentioned-in-letter-of.html

Traditionalists are still interpreting Lumen Gentium 16 with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/12/traditionalists-are-still-interpreting.html

Traditionalists like Reuters correspondents use Cushingism to interpret Vatican Council II : Feeneyism cannot be part of the dialogue.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/12/traditionalists-like-reuters.html

No denial from traditionalists and Catholic journalists : contemporary TLM and Novus Ordo Mass is modernist, accompanied with a heretical theology (for them)

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/12/no-denial-from-traditionalists-and.html

The baptism of desire and blood and being saved in invincible ignorance can be interpreted according to Feeneyism or Cushingism, one approach is irrational

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/12/the-baptism-of-desire-and-blood-and.html

Joseph Shaw removes comment : maintains Cushingite image

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/11/joseph-shaw-removes-comment-maintains.html

Fr.Paul Kramer is not sure what is the difference between me and other Feeneyites

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/08/frpaul-kramer-is-not-sure-what-is.html

Michael Voris could show how Vatican Council II can be interpreted with Cushingism or Feeneyism,with visible exceptions or without them, irrationally or rationally

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/09/michael-voris-could-show-how-vatican.html

CDF Notification on Fr.Jacques Dupuis S.j repeats the error of the 1949 Holy Office Letter : the mistake was placed in Vatican Council in so many passages

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/02/cdf-notification-on-dupuis-repeats.html

SSPX priests are using Cushingism instead of Feeneyism as a theology this is a break with the Syllabus of Errors,traditional ecumenism and the old ecclesiology based on the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/12/sspx-priests-are-using-cushingism.html

Louie Verrecchio still doesn't get it :there is a theology of Cushingism and Feeneyism

 http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/12/louie-verrecchio-still-doesnt-get-it.html

_________________________________________