Roberto dei Mattei through his media is not affirming Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) and extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Feeneyite) and so is approved by the political Left.
He interprets Vatican Council II and EENS with a false premise and on June 23 he is having another one of the traditionalists 'fake conferences' critical of modernism.The subject will be old and new modernism which supposedly excludes him.It is the same with Christopher Ferrara,Michael Matt and the others who speak at the Catholic Family New Conference,the Remant and Angelus Conferences, Catholic Identity and other Conferences.
They have all lost their Catholic identity with EENS and Vatican Council II, Cushingite.
They have all lost their Catholic identity with EENS and Vatican Council II, Cushingite.
They will criticize Vatican Council II (Cushingite)and the popes since Pope John XXIII but they will not interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise.
On the media Roberto dei Mattei, controls or coordinates with (Riscossa Cristiana, Corrspondenza Romano, Lepanto, Radici Cristiani etc ) and Rorate Caeili, none of them will affirm Vatican Council II with LG 8 etc not being an exception to Feeneyite EENS.Why not? They have a choice. But then with the rational and traditional choice , they will be traditionalists.This would be opposed by the Left.Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) would be in harmony with the past understanding on exclusive salvation in the Church and this is what they do not want to support in public.
Changing the interpretation of Vatican Council II and EENS is modernism new and old.The old modernism was there in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and the new modernism is there in the media of Roberto dei Mattei.
The same modernists are at the same conferences and soon there will be one in Italy organized by the politically correct Cushingite professor in England, Dr. John Rao.
Roberto dei Mattei interprets the baptism of desire(BOD),baptism of blood (BOD) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) as referring to visible examples of salvation outside the Church. Then he re-interprets BOD,BOB and I.I in the Catechisms of Trent and Pius X, as being objective exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.This is his modernism.
Then he interprets LG 8,LG 14,LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as being known non Catholics saved without 'faith and baptism'(AG 7).So Vatican Council II (Cushingite) emerges as a rupture with EENS( Feeneyite) and the past exclusivist ecclesiology. This is modernism.
It's the same with the Nicene Creed. It can be interpreted with Feeneyism or Cushingism and they choose Cushingism.
So the modernists at the Lepanto Foundation are organizing a conference this month in Rome against modernism.Possibly Dr. John Rao, Brian McCall and the other traditionalist modernists, will speak once again there, against modernism.
They know about what I write here but they do not care. First comes their careers their profession and their good reputation with the political Left.The funds are there. Cushingite traditionalists are supportive. -Lionel Andrades
Changing the interpretation of Vatican Council II and EENS is modernism new and old.The old modernism was there in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and the new modernism is there in the media of Roberto dei Mattei.
The same modernists are at the same conferences and soon there will be one in Italy organized by the politically correct Cushingite professor in England, Dr. John Rao.
Roberto dei Mattei interprets the baptism of desire(BOD),baptism of blood (BOD) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) as referring to visible examples of salvation outside the Church. Then he re-interprets BOD,BOB and I.I in the Catechisms of Trent and Pius X, as being objective exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.This is his modernism.
Then he interprets LG 8,LG 14,LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as being known non Catholics saved without 'faith and baptism'(AG 7).So Vatican Council II (Cushingite) emerges as a rupture with EENS( Feeneyite) and the past exclusivist ecclesiology. This is modernism.
It's the same with the Nicene Creed. It can be interpreted with Feeneyism or Cushingism and they choose Cushingism.
So the modernists at the Lepanto Foundation are organizing a conference this month in Rome against modernism.Possibly Dr. John Rao, Brian McCall and the other traditionalist modernists, will speak once again there, against modernism.
They know about what I write here but they do not care. First comes their careers their profession and their good reputation with the political Left.The funds are there. Cushingite traditionalists are supportive. -Lionel Andrades
JUNE 13, 2018
Fake conferences
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/fake-conferences.html
https://www.fondazionelepanto.org/
JUNE 10, 2018
John Lamont and Joseph Shaw prepare to talk at the June 23 Lepanto Foundation conference in Rome with their politically correct Cushingite theology, which will preserve their careers and lifestyle and they will get away with it to come back next year
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/john-lamont-and-joseph-shaw-prepare-to.html
https://www.fondazionelepanto.org/JUNE 14, 2018
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment