Official heresy - with false doctrines and irrational theology

RESOURCE: On Worship With Non-Catholics

2267. The faithful are obliged to avoid intercourse in secular affairs with an excommunicatus vitandus, except husband or wife, parents, children, servants, subjects, and in general all who have a reasonable cause for dealing with such excommunicated persons. 2316. Who in any way helps the propagation of heresy or who communicates in sacred ceremonies with heretics against the prescriptions of Canon 1258 is suspect of heresy.

Lionel: Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger and the then Fr. Luiz Ladaria s.j in two papers of the International Theological Commission have rejected traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) with allegedly known cases of non Catholics saved outside the Church as referred, for them, in LG 16 and GS 22.

This is heresy.

Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II as a rupture with the dogma EENS. Since for him too, LG 16 etc would refer to known people saved outside the Church. 

On March 1,2018 at the Placuit Deo Press Conference in answer to a question, Cardinal Luiz Ladarai s.j, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith interpreted LG 8 as referring to known people saved outside the Church.So he said that the Catholic Church no more has the superiority and exclusiveness in salvation.
He has changed doctrine and dogma with an irrational premise which forms his new theology.

This is heresy.Official heresy.

In March 2016 Pope Benedict in an interview in Avvenire said that EENS today, was no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century.He said that there was ' a development' with EENS. In other words LG 16, GS 22 etc are visible examples of salvation outside the Church.

He refused to interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise and then affirm the traditional conclusion.

He refused to interpret EENS without visible for him BOD, BOB and I.I and so in harmony with the  Syllabus of Errors on ecumenism etc and the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church.

He has interpreted all the Catechisms with the same irrational premise.

He has changed the understanding of the Nicene Creed to ' I believe in three or more baptisms for the forgiveness of sins and they exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church'.

He has included visible for him BOD, BOB and I.I as a condition in the New Code of Canon Law 1983.

This is first class heresy.

It is schism with the past popes on EENS.

It is a rupture with the Catechisms mentioned in this website.

_________________________

915. Those who have been excommunicated or interdicted after the imposition or declaration of the penalty and others obstinately persevering in manifest grave sin are not to be admitted to holy communion. 

Lionel: How can Pope Benedict and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria s.j be magisterial when they have used an irrational premise and made an objective mistake? The Holy Spirit cannot teach error.

They are in manifest grave sin for me and they have not denied it all these years.

They also want the Society of St. Pius X to accept Vatican Council II and EENS with this heresy, for canonical recognition.

_________________________

916. A person who is conscious of grave sin is not to celebrate Mass or receive the body of the Lord without previous sacramental confession unless there is a grave reason and there is no opportunity to confess; in this case the person is to remember the obligation to make an act of perfect contrition which includes the resolution of confessing as soon as possible.

Lionel: All the priests at every Rite are offering Holy Mass with the heresies of Pope Benedict and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria, which can be read on line, in black and white. They are supported by Pope Francis.This is an impediment to offering Holy Mass. 

_______________________

1331 §1. An excommunicated person is forbidden: 1) to have any ministerial participation in celebrating the sacrifice of the Eucharist or any other ceremonies of worship whatsoever; 2) to celebrate the sacraments or sacramentals and to receive the sacraments; 3) to exercise any ecclesiastical offices, ministries, or functions whatsoever or to place acts of governance. 1364 §1. Without prejudice to the prescript of can. 194, §1, n. 2, an apostate from the faith, a heretic, or a schismatic incurs a latae sententiae excommunication; in addition, a cleric can be punished with the penalties mentioned in can. 1336, §1, nn. 1, 2, and 3. 1365. A person guilty of prohibited participation in sacred rites (communicatio in sacris) is to be punished with a just penalty. 1369. A person who in a public show or speech, in published writing, or in other uses of the instruments of social communication utters blasphemy, gravely injures good morals, expresses insults, or excites hatred or contempt against religion or the Church is to be punished with a just penalty.

Lionel: 
Here is a concrete case, one of many.
The Archbishop of Palermo, Italy interprets Church documents heretically like Pope Benedict and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria and he has excommunicated Fr. Alessandro M. Minutella.

How can a prelate in first class heresy on doctrine and theology  and in schism with the popes of the past, excommunicate a priest in his diocese who considers giving the Eucharist to the married and divorced and to Protestants, as heresy and a sacrilege?  Archbishop Corrado Lorefice, is supported by Pope Francis and the Masons.

Fr.Alessandro Minutella rejects Pope Francis as the pope since practically the pope supports all this heresy and sacrilege. So he considers himself acting in good conscience and the excommunicate invalid.

Similarly the excommunication of Fr.Leonard Feeney, officially accepted in 2018 ,  was politically motivated since there are no known cases of BOD, BOB and I.I. There are no practical exceptions to traditional EENS and this is common sense.Fr.Leonard Feeney was in line with the catechisms.If he was teaching heresy then so were these catechisms.

Similarly Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre was correct. Vatican Council II with visible for the ecclesiastics BOD, BOB and I.I and LG 8, LG 16, GS 22 etc - is a rupture with Tradition.It is heresy. This is a heretical interpretation of the Council  which was overlooked by Pope John Paul II.

Pope John Paul II and Cardinal Ratzinger were not willing to affirm Vatican Council II -without this irrational interpretation.May be they did not know about it. Let us give them the benefit of the doubt.
If they had chosen this rational option then Vatican Council II ( premise-free) would have been in harmony with EENS and the Catechisms.They would have been interpreting EENS  according to the popes in the ordinary Magisterium, Church Councils and the Catechisms listed on this website.So Archbishop Lefebvre's excommunication also could have been ideological.-Lionel Andrades

https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/c3b8e6_671139e0f68b415a87fe16ed9b1a20ff.pdf