Whispers of Restoration must include the 1994 Catechism with a note on interpreting it with Feeneyism and avoiding the common Cushingism

All the old catechisms from 1555 would reflect the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS)  when the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood (BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) are not considered objective and so exceptions to EENS.This was the mistake in the 1994 Catechism of the Catholic Church(CCC).

CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH MISUNDERSTOOD BOD,BOB AND I.I

The 1994 Catechsim mistook BOD, BOB and I.I as being relevant to EENS as exceptions.So outside the Church there is salvation was the new theology.There were allegedly known cases of the BOD, BOB and I.I and so every one did not have to be ' a card carrying member' of the Catholic Church for salvation, as the catechisms since 1555 suggest.

The seeds of the mistake were there in the Baltimore Catechism when the case of the unknown catechumen who died before receiving the baptism of water, was placed in the Baptism Section.Then the Letter of the Holy Office 1949(LOHO) issued by Cardinal Francesco Marchetti Selvaggiani assumed that the new baptism of desire was an objective exception to the traditional interpretation of EENS.It was as if the BOD was explicit and repeatable like the baptism of water.

So he was interpreting the BOD, BOB and I.I as a rupture with the Catechisms mentioned since 1555 in the new website Whispers of Restoration.There was a schism with the past popes on EENS.The LOHO baltantly states : ' that one may obtain eternal salvation, it is not always required that he be incorporated into the Church actually as a member'. Hullo? Where were the BOD, BOB and I.I cases in 1949? How did EENS become obsolete ?

WHERE WERE THE VISIBLE EXCEPTIONS TO EENS IN 1965

Where were the exceptions in 1965?Since the same mistake was repeated at Vatican Council II and then in the 1994 Catechism.This New Theology based upon the irrational reasoning says there is salvation outside the Church, there is known salvation outside the Church.Invisible non Catholics are examples of known people saved outside the Church.This reasoning is built into Redemptoris Missio, Dominus Iesus,Balamand Declaration, the International Theological Commission papers, Code of Canon Law 1983... 

This is all Cushingite reasoning.We have to identify it.

BY AVOIDING THE FALSE PREMISE WE GO BACK TO THE OLD THEOLOGY

Then we have to re-interpret all magisterial documents avoiding it. The result is traditional Feeneyite theology. We do not have to add anything new. We do not have to create a new theology. By simply avoiding the false premise we have the old theology. So we can undo the mistake in the 1994 Catechism of the Catholic Church.

We interpret the 1994 Catechism of the Catholic Church with Feeneyism and it is in harmony with all the Catechisms cited in Whispers of Restoration.There is no rupture. 

INCLUDE THE 1994 CATECHISM WITH A NOTE ON FEENEYISM

So the team which has produced this website should go ahead and include the 1994 Catechism  with a note asking readers to interpret  it with Feeneyism only( hypothetical cases are only hypothetical, invisible cases are not objectively seen in the present times, 2018). 

In this way the 1994 Catechism of the Catholic Church of Pope John Paul II would be in harmony with the other catechisms on outside the Church there is no salvation.Also it would not be a rupture with Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) which needs to be mentioned on Whispers of Restoration.

The  last catechisms mentioned on the website are those from 1939 and 1949 which support the old ecclesiology since the past theology was Feeneyite.-Lionel Andrades

https://www.whispersofrestoration.com/traditional-catechisms