The SSPX must not condone the interpretation of Vatican Council II with Cushingism as did the St. Benedict Center, USA, to receive canonical recognition.

The SSPX must not condone the interpretation of Vatican Council II with Cushingism as did the St. Benedict Center, USA, to receive canonical recognition.

The traditionalists St.Benedict Center in the diocese of Worcester, USA accepted Vatican Council II interpreted  with Cushingism, by the bishop and his curia.They did not affirm Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) and neither did they ask Bishop Robert McManus to do so.

Brother. Thomas Augustine MICM,Prior, St. Benedict Center, Still River, allowed the diocese to interpret extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) with irrational Cushingism.

The traditionalists condoned Vatican Council II indicating that they also permit EENS( Feeneyite) to be rejected.

Vatican Council II(Cushingite) is a rupture with EENS according to Fr. Leonard Feeney, Sr.Catherine Goddard Clarke,Brother Francis MICM, the founders of their community.

Similarly the St.Benedict Center, Richmond, N.H is recognised by the diocese of Manchester, USA since they do not  object to Vatican Council II (Cushingite).They condone the interpretation of the Nicene Creed and all the Catechisms with the irrational premise.

Theologically they say that there is no baptism of desire to contradict the traditional interpretation of the dogma EENS which they support but in reality they assume that there are known cases of non Catholics saved with the baptism of desire, invincible ignorance  etc. So for them LG 16 (invincible ignorance) and LG 14( case of the unknown catechumen) were  always an exception to Feeneyite EENS.So they rejected Vatican Council II.With their irrational theology, based upon known people saved outside the Church, they create a rupture with EENS and the Syllabus of Errors( ecumenism etc).
Brother Andre Marie MICM, the Prior, at SBC, Richmond,N.H  will not affirm Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and he is recogised by the 'false church' in the diocese of Bishop Peter Anthony Libasci, in Manchester.

Similarly the SSPX must not compromise on theology and doctrine only to get canonical recognition.

Avoid the mistake of conservatives like Michael Voris and CMTV who interpret Vatican Council II and EENS with the irrational premise and are not opposed by Rome. It is the same with Fr.John Zuhlsdorf, Roberto dei Mattei and others.

The SSPX must affirm Vatican Council II(Feeneyite) and reject Vatican Council II (Cushingite) and demand canonical status, since they would have met the requirement to accept Vatican Council II.

Say YES to Vatican Council II( F) and NO to  Vatican Council II (C) and demand the use of all churches to offer Holy Mass,  since they would not be in schism and doctrinally have not rejected Vatican Council II.

-Lionel Andrades

https://www.privateschoolreview.com/immaculate-heart-of-mary-school-profile/01467