A factual error was made in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case and it has influenced the interpretation of Vatican Council II by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF)

A factual error was made in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case and it has influenced the interpretation of Vatican Council II by the  Congregation for the Doctrine of the  Faith(CDF).

Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj, Prefect of the CDF considers LG 8 an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) since the CDF(Holy Office 1949) considered the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) as exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.

According to the apologist John Martignoni 'zero cases' of something are not exceptions to EENS.There are no known cases of BOD,BOB and I.I in 2018. Everybody agrees on this point.

This is something objective.There are no physically visible or personally known cases of BOD etc over the last 50 years.So Vatican Council II made a mistake to mention it in Lumen Gentium 16 ( invincible ignorance) and Lumen Gentium 14 (case of the unknown catechumen).

BOD etc are not exceptions to the dogma EENS says Archbishop Thomas Gullickson, Nuncio to Switzerland and Liechtenstein.He is making an objective observation.But Cardinal Ratzinger and Cardinal Ladaria as Prefects of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, has interpreted BOD, BOB and I.I as referring to physically visible and personally known non Catholics saved outside the Catholic Church.So they made BOD, BOB and I.I a rupture with the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church and the Syllabus of Errors ( ecumenism of return).Probably if someone brought this to their attention they would agree with Archbishop Gullickson and everybody else. Since this is the rational observation.

They have made this error on line  and in 'magisterial documents' and the mistake originates with the Fr. Leonard Feeney case. An injustice was done to this priest from Boston who refused to say that unknown cases of BOD,BOB and I.I were relevant or exceptions to the dogma EENS.

-Lionel Andrades

See the timing at 28:53 on this video. Cardinal Ladaria in answer to a question cites LG 8 as an exception to EENS.This is an objective error and it comes from the mistake the Church made in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case.

________________________________________

________________________________________

DECEMBER 30, 2017

Repost : Archbishop Thomas E.Gullickson says Vatican Council II does not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2017/12/repost-archbishop-thomas-egullickson.html

 AUGUST 16, 2018

It was based upon the error the CDF(Holy Office 1949) made in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case that at the Placuit Deo Press Conference on March 1,2018 Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj interpreted Lumen Gentium 8 as being an exception to the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church. : a correction needs to be made by the CDF

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/08/it-was-based-upon-error-cdfholy-office.html