Father John Zuhlsdorf runs with the hares and hunts with the hounds on Vatican Council II

PART OF THE FALSE CHURCH
Father John Zuhlsdorf is part of the false church when he assumes unknown cases of the baptism of desire ( BOD), baptism of blood (BOD) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) are known non Catholics saved outside the Church without the baptism of water. So with known cases of BOD, BOB and I.I  being practical exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus( EENS), he creates the New Theology. Then with this New Theology ( practical exceptions to EENS with salvation outside the Church) he interprets Vatican Council II as a rupture with EENS and the past ecclesiology.He then rejects the Council without re-interpreting it with invisible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I being invisible and LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 also being invisible and unknown to us in 2018.

RUNS WITH THE HARES AND HUNTS WITH THE HOUNDS

Then when the liberals criticize him for rejecting Vatican Council II, he claims that he affirms Vatican Council II according to the Bologna School, like Pope Francis.Roberto dei Mattei uses the same ploy.

But the Bologna School also interprets Vatican Council II  with the New Theology and so there is a rupture with the past exclusivist ecclesiology.

OFFERS LATIN MASS WITH THE NEW THEOLOGY

Then he says the hope for the Church is the Latin Mass, which he offers, of course, with the New Theology.So there is the New Ecclesiology and a New Ecumenism. There is a clear break with the Latin Mass offered for example in the 16th century.The Mass he offers is anything but ' the Mass of the centuries' but really has innovative theology which was brought into the Church by Rome in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case.

INTER FAITH MARRIAGES ARE NOT A MORTAL SIN AND ADULTERY FOR HIM

Since he is a liberal on this issue and infers that there is known salvation outside the Catholic Church, he encourages inter faith marriages.They are not a mortal sin and adultery for him.

Since there is known salvation outside the Church for him, according to the reasoning of the New Theology, EENS is obsolete.This would be heresy for the Jesuits in the Middle Ages when they offered the Tridentine Rite Mass and not today's Latin Mass approved by the Vatican.

DID NOT OBJECT TO CARD.LADARIA MISINTERPRETING LG 8

So he did not object to Cardinal Ladaria saying at the Placuet Deo Press Conference( March 1,2018) that Lumen Gentium 8 (elements of sanctification and truth in other religions) is an exception to EENS( the Church having the superiority and exclusiveness in salvation).For him too, LG 8 refers to known people saved outside the Church.He could meet them and name them.

Neither did he say that Pope Bendict was wrong(March 2016, Avvenire) to interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with EENS according to the missionaries of the 16th century.

TO REJECT THE DOGMA EENS IS HERESY AND AN IMPEDIMENT TO OFFERING HOLY MASS

But to offer the Latin Mass while rejecting the original interpretation of the dogma EENS, and that too with an irrationality, is a heresy and a mortal sin of faith. He has rejected a de fide teaching which is obligatory for all priests to affirm.This is an impediment to his offering Holy Mass.

TO INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II AS A RUPTURE WITH THE SYLLABUS OF ERRORS IS ALSO HERESY

Similarly not to interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with the Syllabus of Errors( ecumenism of return) is also heresy. This is gnosticism.This is choosing and changing doctrines and interpreting theology independently.

So when Fr. Zuhlsdorf projects the Latin Mass as being a hope for the future it definitly will not be his Latin Mass offered with manifest heresy and in schism, with the past popes and Church Councils.

Instead he is part of the problem, a part of the false church.

On the other hand a Catholic could attend the Novus Ordo Mass in Italian or English, or the Byzantine Mass, or Mass in Tamil in a different Rite, and not be in public heresy and schism like Fr. Z is, as he tries, to remain politically correct with the Left and so chooses public sin.-Lionel Andrades 

MARCH 25, 2018

Fr.John Zuhlsdorf still uses the LOHO irrational reasoning to misinterpret Vatican Council II and EENShttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018_03_25_archive.html

MARCH 17, 2015

Fr.John Zuhlsdorf does not believe in the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus : advice on interfaith marriages

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/frjohn-zuhlsdorf-does-not-believe-in.html

Vatican/Vicariate is not allowing priests in Rome to interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism : incardìnation prohibition

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/06/vaticanvicariate-is-not-allowing.html

OCTOBER 1, 2015

Fr.John Zuhlsdorf is in material heresyhttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/10/frjohn-zuhlsdorf-is-in-material-heresy.html

What if Cardinal Burke and Fr. Zuhlsdorf said that there are no known exceptions to Catholic moral and salvation theology ?.Would they lose their religious faculties in Rome? 

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/04/what-if-cardinal-burke-and-fr-zuhlsdorf.html