Peter and Michael Dimond at the Most Holy Family Monastery, USA used rational and traditional Feeneyism as a theology to interpret extra ecclesiam nulla salus a dogma of the Church, while the popes, all the cardinals and all the bishops used irrational Cushingism as a theology to interpret EENS.

It is important to note Peter and Michael Dimond at the Most Holy Family Monastery(MHFM), USA used rational and traditional Feeneyism as a theology to interpret extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), a dogma of the Church, while the popes, all the cardinals and all the bishops used irrational Cushingism as a theology to interpret EENS.

Feeneyism says invisible cases are invisible, hypothetical cases are hypothetical, the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) refer to hypothetical cases only. They are not objective people saved outside the Catholic Church in 2018 or over the last 50 years.

Cushingism says invisible cases are visible, hypothetical cases are defacto and personally known in the present times, BOD,BOB and I.I refer to objective people saved outside the Church.

The MHFM has rejected BOD, BOB and I.I as exceptions to EENS and so in this way they emerge Feeneyite. It is the same with the St. Benedict Centers, USA, the communities of Fr.Leonard Feeney of Boston.So they are Feeneyite in this sense.

The popes, cardinals and bishops use Cushingism to interpret EENS and they reject a Feeneyite interpretation of EENS.But Cushingism is irrational and creates a hermeneutic of rupture.

So the popes,cardinals and bishops, interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism and then there is a rupture with EENS ( Feeneyite).

They interpret the Catechisms with Cushingism and so there is a rupture with EENS( Feeneyite).The Catechisms contradict EENS( Feeneyite).

They have a rational choice. They can interpret Vatican Council II and the Catechisms with Feeneyism and then there will not be a rupture with EENS ( Feeneyite).

Similarly they can interpret EENS with Feeneyism i.e invisible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I are simply invisible and they can reject their present Cushingite interpretation of EENS i.e invisible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I are visible exceptions to EENS as it was known to the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century.
So Peter and Michael Dimond are correct on EENS and the popes, cardinals and bishops are wrong.
-Lionel Andrades

AUGUST 28, 2018

MHFM affirm traditional EENS with Feeneyite theology while the bishops use irrational Cushingism

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/08/mhfm-affirm-traditional-eens-with.html