Everyone agrees Vatican Council II has a major philosophical mistake
The reference for Lumen Gentium 16, Vatican Council II is the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 1
Today we know that the Letter made an objective mistake.Invisible cases of being saved in invincible ignorance cannot be visible exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).This same philosophical error was the bad reasoning at Vatican Council II.This cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit.
The initial error was not corrected by Pope Pius XII and Pope John XXIII also overlooked the mistake.Nor did he lift the excommunication of Fr. Leonard Feeney.So Catholics believed that there were exceptions to the traditional interpretation of EENS.
Then so much of Vatican Council II was based on this error.In principle hypothetical cases were assumed to be objective.They are mentioned in the text - LG 16, LG 8, LG 14, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22, AG 7, AG 11 etc.
Cardinal Ottaviani and Archbishop Lefebvre said nothing.Mons. Clifford Fenton, Ludwig Ott and Fr.William Most said nothing.They did not ask themselves how can invisible people be visible exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.
So the Council has been built on human error.It is heretical. It is not simply non traditional and irrational.
With an irrational premise the dogma EENS has been rejected.
With an irrational premise the Nicene Creed means 'I believe in three or more baptisms and they exclude the baptism of water. They are desire, blood, invincible ignorance, seeds of the Word(AG 11) etc'.
With an irrationality Pope Benedict confirmed in March 2016 that Vatican Council II was 'a developmen't of the dogma EENS. It was no more like it was for the magisterium of the 16th century and he was not going to interpret the Council without the irrational premise.
He was acknowledging that the development came from the Letter of the Holy Office, a private letter from one bishop to another which the Archdiocese of Boston made public three years after it was issued by Rome and which his friend Fr. Karl Rahner placed in the Denzinger.
Ralph Martin and Robert Fastiggi do not deny that Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise and non traditional conclusion.2
Ralph Martin does not deny 1) that the baptism of desire is not physically visible in 2017 and that 2) invisible baptism of desire is not an explicit exception to the dogma EENS
Ralph Martin does not deny that Pope Francis has made the same two philosophical errors in his interpretation of Vatican Council II. He has violated the Principle of Non Contradiction.
In other words the pope made an objective mistake in the interpretation of Vatican Council II.Ralph Martin himself has been teaching this error at the Sacred Heart Major Seminary, Detroit.
He does not deny that when he wrote his books on Evangelisation and 'Will Many Be Saved'(Amazon) he made the above two errors.
Everyone agrees I.I is not an exception to EENS and yet this was the reasoning at Vatican Council II.This is a major philosophical error. It runs through Vatican Council II like a theme(LG 16, LG 8, LG 14, UR 3, NA 2,AG 7, AG 11, GS 22 etc).This is not the teaching of the Holy Spirit.
-Lionel Andrades
1
Diabolical disorientation is due to the one turning point in the Church's life which has been entirely detrimental to the faith. Lumen Gentium Chapter 2 Section 16: Those also can attain to salvation who through no fault of their own do not know the Gospel of Christ or His Church, yet sincerely seek God and moved by grace strive by their deeds to do His will as it is known to them through the dictates of conscience. (19) Cfr. Epist. S.S.C.S. Officii ad Archiep. Boston.: Denz. 3869-72.
Footnote 19 gives source authority to the 1949 Holy Office Pelagian heresy letter to Archbishop Cushing and is the theological foundation for modern ecumenism and ecumenism is the theological foundation for the Novus Ordo and justifies the overthrow of nearly all traditional Catholic teaching resulting in our Church being, for the most part, Neo-Protestant.-Warren Goddard
2.
Ralph Martin and Robert Fastiggi do not deny that Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise and non traditional conclusion
_____________________________
December 15, 2016
UNPRECEDENTED!PHILOSOPHICAL MISTAKES DISCOVERED IN VATICAN COUNCIL II
DECEMBER 14, 2016
Catholic professors in Rome now tell lies : pontifical universities don't want to be quoted on a philosophical subject
DECEMBER 13, 2016
Traditionalists too unaware of major philosophical mistake : many errors in Vatican Council II
DECEMBER 13, 2016
Too many mistakes in Vatican Council II
DECEMBER 12, 2016
Vatican Council II riddled with philosphical error : two popes in principle support objective error in text eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/vatican-council…
DECEMBER 11, 2016
The source of the present Arian-like heresy throughout the Church today is due to the following points eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/the-source-of-p…
DECEMBER 10, 2016
The present magisterium has made a major philosophical mistake
DECEMBER 11, 2016
Priest confirms philosophical error : Lefebvre excommunication a mistake
DECEMBER 10, 2016
Scholars supporting four cardinals in major philosophical mistake
DECEMBER 1, 2016
There is a mistake in Vatican Council II and once the error is identified and avoided, the interpretation of the Council radically changes.There is no 'spirit of Vatican Council II ' excuse anymore
NOVEMBER 29, 2016
So it is only by using an irrationality that the present magisterium can re-interpret magisterial documents and say Vatican Council II indicates all Jews and Muslims in Italy do not need to convert into the Catholic Church in 2016
https://gloria.tv/article/ZqXRviApVEho4MfWmE6jyDpqL
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment