Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre like the liberals made a mistake on Vatican Council II and so the blame should not be placed on Vatican Council II only.

Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre like the liberals made a mistake on Vatican Council II and so the blame should not be placed on Vatican Council II only. It is common for Rorate Caeili, Remnant and other traditionalists to routinely blame Vatican Council II, without making the distinction between Vatican Council II Cushingite and Vatican Council II, Feeneyite.Vatican Council II with Feeneyism can be interpreted in harmony with extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and the Syllabus of Errors.On this point there is no denial on these websites or from the public relations office of the Society of St.Pius X(SSPX) over the last few years.They simply keep quiet.

The SSPX bishops must admit that Archbishop Lefebvre only knew of Vatican Council II, Cushingite.He interpreted the baptism of desire etc with irrational Cushingism.He accepted the Cushingite interpretation of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 as did the SSPX bishops.Literally they did not know of any baptism of desire case and yet they criticized Fr. Leonard Feeney.

None of them stated that Vatican Council II could be intepreted with Feeneyism and there was no rupture with EENS or the Syllabus of Errors.They were misled and they continued to mislead others.

-Lionel Andrades