Lefebvrist traditionalists and sedevacantists interpret Vatican Council II, EENS like Bishop Kevin Rhoades, Chairman of the USCCB Doctrinal Committee and yet they criticize Medugorje on doctrine

Lefebvrist traditionalists and sedevacantists are interpreting Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) like Bishop Kevin Rhoades, the new Chairman of the USCCB Doctrinal Committee  and yet criticize criticizing Medugorje on doctrine.

 

For me Lumen Gentium 8 ( elements of sanctification and truth in other religions) is not an exception to EENS, while for them, it is.So Vatican Council II becomes a rupture with the Syllabus of Errors on ecumenism and salvation in non Christian religions.

For me 1) there are no practical cases of LG 8 in our reality(2018),2) the text of Vatican Council II  does not mention any physically visible case, 3)and common sense tells us that LG 8 is a reference to a hypothetical and speculative case.

But the traditionalists and liberals, heretics and Masons, interpret LG 8 as a rupture with Tradition.( Catechism of Pope Pius X, EENS etc).

With all this irrationality,the Catechism of Pope Pius X contradicts itself for them. Visible for them invincible ignorance contradicts the Catechism also saying all need to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation.

With their false inference Vatican Council II contradicts the Syllabus of Errors. Visible for them and personally known cases of LG 8 and UR 3 contradict the Syllabus on outside the Church there is no salvation and an ecumenism of return.

With their false premise( invisible non Catholics are visible) the Syllabus of Errors ( ecumenism of return) is contradicted by the Catechism of Pope Pius X (invincible ignorance)...and then they criticize Medugorje on doctrine!!

We now know that with reference to the baptism of desire 1) there are no practical cases in 2018, 2) the popes and saints did not state that there were physically visible and personally known cases of non Catholics saved outside the Catholic Church,and 3)the baptism of desire was always recognised as a hypothetical case.This is common sense.

Since the traditionalists and sedevacantists know all this why don't they announce that they made a mistake ? They can admit that Archbishop Lefebvre like Cardinal Ratzinger made a mistake.

VATICAN EXORCIST AMORTH SPEAKS ABOUT MEDJUGORJE ON NATIONAL TV

Instead they criticize Holy Mass in the vernacular, Medugorje, Neo Cathechumenal Way, Focolares, Catholic Charismatic Renewal etc.

The lay Catholic communities and religious organizations are making the same error as the traditionalists.They are all liberals, since the traditionalists cannot correct them on doctrine. They cannot be taught correct doctrine because of the common irrational inference being made by those who only attend the Latin Mass today, which is offered with the new ecclesiology, the new theology, of which they are not aware of..-Lionel Andrades