Was Pope Paul VI an infiltrator ?

Was Pope Paul VI an infiltrator or did he crumble before powerful enemies of the Catholic Church?

He overlooked the mistake in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949(LOHO) and then overlooked the same objective mistake in the Vatican Council II.

He did not support Fr. Leonard Feeney on exclusive salvation and did not lift the excommunication during Vatican Council II.He interpreted extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) with the false premise; with Cushingism( hypothetical cases like the baptism of desire are objectively seen and known in the present times).

Then he interpreted Vatican Council II with Cushingism and permitted Mixed Marriages.He did not call it adultery. He assumed there was known salvation outside the Church and so the non Catholic spouse in a mixed marriage, could be saved, or was saved.

Since he was interpreting Vatican Council II and EENS with Cushingism he ended traditional mission.It was based upon exclusive salvation in the Church. For him there was known salvation outside the Catholic Church, even though practically he did not know any case of a  non Catholic saved in invincible ignorance(I.I), baptism of desire(BOB) and the baptism of blood(BOB) without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.This would only be known to God if there was an exception.

He prohibited the Latin Mass and in only special cases it was permitted while the New Mass had to offered with the New Ecclesology and New Theology, created from Cushingite irrational reasoning.

Since he was interpreting EENS and Vatican Council II with Cushingism  there was known salvation outside the Church. So there was no need to proclaim the Social Reign of Christ the King when non Cathlics could be saved. With non Catholics beings saved outside the Church for him, the non separation of Church and State was not a priority.He would support a secular state with the separation of Church and State.

The Mass that was being offered after Vatican Council II was a sacrilege  since the Nicene Creed was changed, the Athanasius  Creed rejected and EENS was rejected.Vatican Council II was not interpreted with Feeneyism but irrational Cushingism, to create a rupture with the past ecclesiology.

Now after 50 years when we have found the precise cause of the hermeneutic of rupture with the past-  we can undo his work.

We first have to realize that invisible cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I), are not physically visible  exceptions to the teaching, on all needing to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation ( Catechism of Pope Pius X etc).So BOD, BOB and I.I are not and never were exceptions to EENS.

Hypothetical cases ( BOD,BOB and I.I) are just hypothetical.Similarly hypothetical cases in Vatican Council II ( LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc) are not exceptions to the past ecclesiology.

The past ecclesiology is intact. Vatican Council II and EENS do not contradict it.We can affirm EENS and invisible and hypothetical for us BOD, BOB and I.I. It is not either-or.

The  Nicene Creed still says for a Feeneyite, 'I believe in one known baptism for the forgiveness of sins, it is only the baptism of water.'It means the Holy Office 1949 was wrong and Fr. Leonard Feeney was teaching Catholic orthodoxy on salvation.

So today we can attend the old or new Mass and affirm the past ecclesiology in which there can only be an ecumenism of return.The New Ecumenism is based on known salvation outside the Church. It depended upon this Cushingite reasoning.

There is no known salvation outside the Church.So there is no Anonymous Christian or new ecumenism.

Since we interpret Vatican Council II and EENS with Feeneyism( hypothetical cases are just hypothetical),Mission still says, that all non Catholics, with no known exception need to enter the Church as members to avoid Hell and not just 'those who know'.So the majority of non Catholics today are oriented to Hell without 'faith and baptism'(AG 7, Vatican Council II).The majority and not just 'those who know'.Vatican Council II(AG 7) says all need to enter the Church with faith and baptism for salvation.

Since outside the Church there is no salvation and no known salvation for us human beings,proclaiming the Social Reign of Christ the King is necessary to save souls.So the non separation of Church and State must still be a priority.Jesus will be the centre of all political and social legislation.

The ecclesiology, with Feeneyism, is the same today in 2018, as it was before Vatican Council II and the Letter of the Holy Office 1949.

With Feeneyism there can only be the Old Ecclesiology, Old Theology ,Old Ecumenism and Old Mission and traditional faith and moral teachings since EENS has no exceptions.When EENS has no exceptions it means Mixed Marriages are adultery.

So we can proclaim the Good News with the kerygma,knowing that the Catholic Church is Jesus Mystical Body, in which every one needs to be a member to avoid Hell and go to Heaven.

-Lionel Andrades