Msgr.Nicola Bux would make a Profession of Faith with an irrational premise and inference

Msgr.Nicola Bux  interprets the Nicene Creed and Vatican Council II with the New Theology.He uses an irrational premise and inference.So his conclusion would be irrational, non traditional and heretical.He has asked that Pope Francis issue a Profession of Faith.1 If Pope Francis made a Profession of Faith it would be interpreted by him and the Cushingites, with the New Theology and so would be modernism.

Similarly Cardinal Raymond Burke is conservative on some subjects but over the years he has interpreted Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church with the New Theology.Fr. John Hardon did the same.

Bishop Athanasius Schneider interprets Vatican Council II with the New Theology.So there is a rupture with the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX. Then he calls for a new Syllabus of Errors on Vatican Council II, when the fault really lies with his irrational premise and inference.

Msgr. Joseph Clifford Fenton and other fine apologists were all using the New Theology which came in a big way into the Church with the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office.Though the seeds of the error were already there in the Baltimore Catechism.

So if Msgr. Nicola Bux would make a Profession of Faith it would be with the New Theology and it would be modernism.

Similarly John Lamont and Roberto Dei Mattei mentioned the New Theology critically at one of the conferences last summer in Rome.But both of them interpret Vatican Council II and the Catechisms with the New Theology.They are not aware of it.They use the false premise and inference and do not know that this creates the New Theology.It creates the hermeneutic of rupture with the past. So their interpretation of Vatican Council II is non traditional and then they wrongly blame the Council.-Lionel Andrades

1

https://edwardpentin.co.uk/monsignor-bux-pope-francis-must-urgently-issue-profession-of-faith/