Catholics in future could find themselves having to to contest the Catholic Church's right to call itself Catholic using false reasoning and subterfuge and then legally labelling faithful Catholics as non Catholics since they do not accept the official heresy.

Catholics in future could find themselves having to  to contest the Catholic Church's right to call itself Catholic using false reasoning and subterfuge and then legally labelling faithful Catholics as non Catholics since they do not accept the official heresy.

Traditionalists and conservatives in the future may find themselves legally having to contest  the Catholic Church's right to call itself Catholic when it uses false  reasoning and  an irrational premise and inference to create a rupture  with the dogma  EENS, the past exclusivist ecclesiology,an ecumenism of return, the Syllabus of Errors and the rest of Tradition.

With the use of a false premise and inference magisterial documents  are interpreted irrationally by the CDF and the two popes, to create a rupture  with the teaching on exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. Those Catholics who do not accept this conclusion will be branded non Catholics by the CDF and legally part of a sect  etc.

The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) has apostatized and is supporting Satan and the Left for the survival of the Vatican in its present structural form.

Deceptive reasoning and hidden lies are being used by the CDF to change Catholic doctrine on exclusive salvation.This was underway even before Vatican Council II and it is now official on the website of the Diocese of Manchester, USA.

Legally the CDF cannot claim invisible non Catholics saved with invisible cases of the baptism of desire(BOD),baptism of blood( BOB)  and invincible ignorance( I.I ) are visible exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). 

This is subterfuge.

The CDF cannot claim that hypothetical cases referred to in LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are objective exceptions of salvation outside the Church. So these 'visible exceptions' contradict the strict interpretation of EENS,for the CDF.The SSPX has to use this reasoning to avoid being labelled a non Catholic organisation.

The CDF could be challenged legally in the future  when it uses this irrationality to label a traditionalist as being legally not a Catholic.-Lionel Andrades






Precepts of Prohibition
 https://www.catholicnh.org/assets/Documents/About/FAQ/Decree-Precepts-StBenedictCtr.pdf