New CDF Sec.wants to create schism : supports heresy and sacrilege

 






The Secretary of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF), Archbishop Giacomo Morandi wants all bishops to say that LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II contradict extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) as it was known to the Magisterium in the 16th century.The Diocese of Manchester, USA and the CDF  call it a 'nuanced' interpretation of EENS.
Pope Benedict calls it ' a development'(Avvenire, March 2016).

This new understanding of EENS was confirmed at the Placquet Deo Press Conference on March 1,2018.

Now the CDF is telling the St. Benedict Center in the Diocese of Manchester, that it is not enough to cite Vatican Council II, Ad Gentes 7 which says all need faith and baptism for salvation.They have to interpret LG 8 etc as referring to known non Catholics saved outside the Church. So then  these personally known and physically visible non Catholics, become practical and objective exceptions to the dogma EENS.

This is irrational. 
There are no known practical exceptions to EENS .
Since LG 8 etc always refer to hypothetical possibilities only for us human beings.
If they existed they would be known only to God.
We cannot meet or see someone saved with 'elements of sanctification and truth'(LG 8) outside the Church in other religions.
Neither can we meet or see someone on earth saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16).
So LG 8, LG 16, GS 22 etc never ever were exceptions to Ad Gentes 7 or the centuries old interpretation of the dogma EENS.

The irrational CDF now wants Bishop Peter Libasci, the bishop of Manchester to also make this irrational claim.So Bishop Libasci is asking the St. Benedict Center(SBC), in New Hampshire to affirm this 'nuanced' version of Vatican Council II and EENS even though it is irrational and heretical.

If the SBC agrees then it means for them  hypothetical cases referenced in LG 8 etc, would refer to personally known and physically visible non Catholics saved without 'faith and baptism' in 2019.Since only in this way can LG 8, LG 16,UR 3, GS 22 etc be exceptions to EENS.

This would mean invincible ignorance(LG 16), the baptism of desire(LG 14)  etc are objective exceptions to EENS, as it was known to Fr. Leonard Feeney and the founders of the St. Benedict Center in Manchester and also in Worcester, where the SBC have full canonical status.

Since BOD, BOB and I.I and LG 8 etc refer to exceptions to EENS for the CDF and Bishop Libasci, magisterial documents are re-interpreted. irrationally.

The Nicene Creed now says, ' I believe in three or more known baptisms for the forgiveness of sins. They are desire, blood and invincible ignorance and they exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.'This 2019 version is different from that of the interpretation of the Nicene Creed in the 16th century.

The Apostles Creed says 'I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Holy Catholic Church' which teaches that there is known salvation outside the Church and contradicts the teaching of the Holy Spirit over the centuries on outside the Church there is no salvation.So there is  also a new understanding of the Apostles Creed.

The Athanasius Creed is rejected. It says outside the Church there is no salvation.The Diocese of Manchester according to their website is not allowing the Catholics at the SBC to use the Athanasius Creed as a Profession of Faith.

The old catechisms would contradict each other.The Catechism of Pope Pius X says all need to be members of the Church for salvation and it also mentions invincible ignorance which would refer to physically visible cases for the CDF.

St.Thomas Aquinas affirmed the strict interpretation of EENS but also mentioned I.I and BOD and so he too would contradict himself for Archbishop Giacomo Morandi and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria.

The Catechism of Pope Pius X (invincible ignorance) would also contradict the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius X ( EENS, ecumenism of return) for the CDF and the present two popes.

The Catechism of the Catholic Church(1994)  would make no sense at CCC 1257( The Necessity of Baptism).Since it states that the Church knows of no means to eternal salvation other than the baptism of water and also says 'God is not limited to the Sacraments.'

'God is not limited to the Sacraments' is a hypothetical possibility only and is not a real person saved outside the Church. It should not have been mentioned in the Catechism(1257).

For me Vatican Council II(LG 8,LG 16 etc ) does not contradict EENS but for Cardinal Ladaria, Vatican Council II contradicts EENS, the Syllabus of Errors and the past ecclesiology.So the CDF has intentionally chosen a rupture with Tradition when a rational and traditional choice is available.

This is all heresy.

It is first class heresy in the hierarchy of truth of Pope John Paul II.

It is heresy for the CDF to change the meaning of the Creeds.

It is heresy for the CDF not to accept Vatican Council II in harmony with traditional EENS.

It is heresy for the CDF to assume UR 3( imperfect communion with the Church) is a rupture with an ecumenism of return or GS 22( people of good will) is a rupture with EENS.
With all this heresy the Holy Mass which is offered becomes a sacrilege for the priest.
It is with this heresy and sacrilege that Bishop Peter Libasci and his Curia offer Holy Mass. Now he is enforcing the same heresy on the community  of religious and lay people at the St. Benedict Center.-Lionel Andrades



 http://www.heraldmalaysia.com/news/graduate-of-romes-gregorian-university-named-doctrinal-congregations-deputy/37509/4