Cushingite Bishop Schneider - still politically correct

 

Magisterial documents can be interpreted with Feeneyism or Cushingism as a reasoning, and the conclusions would be different.Bishop Athanasius Schneider is irrational on the salvation issue.He's a Cushingite. So his interpretation of Vatican Council II has to be a rupture with Tradition.

 Bishop Athanasius Schneider has issued a statement on the uniqueness of faith in Christ, to remedy confusion arising from the controversial document Pope Francis signed with a Grand Imam earlier this week in Abu Dhabi, according to LifeSitesNews. 1
Let me explain.

For Feeneyites hypothetical cases are just hypothetical. 

For Cushingites  hypothetical cases  are objective  and personally known people  saved outside the Catholic Church.

So for a Feeneyite  the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) being hypothetical and not real persons in 2019, do not contradict  traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).

For a Cushingite invisible cases of the BOD, BOB and I.I are objective people saved outside the Church they are practical exceptions to     EENS.

Similarly for a Feeneyite, LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are possibilities known only to God.

For Cushingites they are personally known people saved outside the Church and they could never be exceptions to EENS, the past ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return and the Syllabus of Errors.

SCHNEIDER IS A CUSHINGITE ON EENS AND VATICAN COUNCIL II

So on EENS as on Vatican Council  Archbishop Schneider is a Cushingite.This is why there was so much confusion in his statement.

He could not say all non Catholics and non Christians in 2019 are oriented to Hell unless they enter the Catholic Church.

There are known exceptions for him.He would not say that Jesus and membership in the Catholic Church cannot be separated (Dominus Iesus) and so all Protestants, Orthodox Christians, Pentecostals and others are oriented to Hell.They are outside the Church.

He is a liberal on this point.So are the present two popes, who also use Cushingite irrationality. For all of them there was salvation outside the Church as if they were allowed to go to Heaven and see people there without faith and baptism in the Catholic Church.

Bishop Schneider's statement was not controversial for the Left. Since even the Jehovah Witnesses believe in Jesus, though they say he is one with St.Michael the Archangel.The Left accepts belief in Jesus as long as it is without Catholic faith and morality.

Bishop Schneider cited Dominus Iesus  which says other religions do not have faith but belief-  but he still believes non Catholics can be saved and are saved in their religion, even if they are not visible members of the Catholic Church. So for him  since theoretically,    a non Catholic can be saved in his religion and when he is in heaven will be a Catholic- practically everyone does not need to be a member of the Catholic Church for salvation. With a hypothetical case he reasons, not every one needs to be a practical member of the Church for salvation.With a theoretical, case of salvation in another religion, he assumes there is an objective exception to the teaching on all needing faith and baptist for salvation.

 So he goes ahead and assumes that he knows someone saved in another religion and then does not say that all non Catholics in 2019 are oriented to Hell unless they enter the Church.   -Lionel Andrades

1.

 https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/bishop-athanasius-schneider-issues-statement-on-controversial-document