In 1949 and 1965 someone should have announced that Fr. Leonard Feeney was correct and the Holy Office was wrong since there are no known cases of BOD, BOB and I.I

In 1949 and 1965 someone should have announced that Fr. Leonard Feeney was correct and the Holy Office was wrong since there are no known cases of BOD, BOB and I.I. 1

BOD, BOB and I.I were only theoretical and speculative cases for the popes and saints over the centuries.

They could not be objective people . This is common sense. It is something obvious.

Instead of seeing through this error, a New Theology was unfortunately created in 1949 and it was repeated in 1965. The New Theology suggests there is salvation outside the Church. It assumes there are personally known people saved outside the Church. This is also the mistake the traditionalists make when they interpret Vatican Council II.

So the understanding of the Apostles Creed, the Nicene Creed and the Athanasius Creed has changed.The old catechisms contradict each other , The Syllabus of Errors has become obsolete.Yet this new understanding and interpretation of Magisterial documents was the false narrative maintained by the popes, cardinals and bishops after 1949.It is an objective mistake and so cannot be magisterial.The Holy Spirit cannot make a mistake.
Even Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre  and the traditionalists of his time,  made the same mistake.
The Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) and the SSPX(Resistance) today use the New Theology to interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with EENS.They can now simply announce that the Council does not contradict extra ecclesiam nulla salus and that Fr.Leonard Feeney was correct and the popes and cardinals were wrong.
The same announcement can be made by the sedevacantist communities of Bishop Donald Sanborn and Mark Pivarunas. They can also admit that they slandered Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.

1

BOD( Baptism of desire), BOB ( Baptism of Blood), I.I ( Invincible Ignorance)