The present interpretation of Vatican Council II is political. In ignorance even the traditionalist and conservative Catholic follows it.
They look at Lumen Gentium 8(elements of sanctification and truth outside the Church) etc in Vatican Council II as referring to personally non Catholics saved outside the Church with faith and baptism.They also ignore Lumen Gentium 14 and Ad Gentes 7 which says all need faith and baptism for salvation.
They really need to approach Vatican Council II with AG 7, LG 14 supporting the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and not with LG 8 etc referring to personally known people in 2019 and so are exceptions to AG 7 and LG 14.This would be traditional and rational.
The present irrational way of reading Vatican Council II has been cultivated by Pope Benedict and other liberals.
Catholics are misled by the theological papers of the International Theological Commission, Vatican.
The present irrational way of reading Vatican Council II has been cultivated by Pope Benedict and other liberals.
Catholics are misled by the theological papers of the International Theological Commission, Vatican.
We now can change how we look at Vatican Council II and know that that the Council indicates there is no salvation outside the Church.
The Balamand Declaration and the Joint Declaration on Justification with the Lutherans were possible with the irrational way of reading the Council. Cardinal Ratzinger believed there was personally known non Catholics saved outside the Church.For him the baptism of desire(BOD),baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) were exceptions to EENS.Fr. Leonard Feeney was wrong and the Holy Office was correct in 1949 was his reasoning.
This has to change now. We have to look at the Letter of the Holy Office 1949(LOHO) with BOD,BOB and I.I not referring to objective and personally known people.So they do not contradict the first part( introduction) of LOHO which supports traditional EENS.
BOD,BOB and I.I are always hypothetical. Always.We do not have any other way of looking at it.
LG 8, LG 16, UR 3, GS 22 etc are always hypothetical.There is no other rational alternative,no other way of looking at it.
So the political interpretation of Vatican Council II is dishonest. It is deceptive.It suggests that there are pro and against -EENS passages in Vatican Council II.
No. There are only pro-EENS passages in the Council.
The seemingly 'against' passages must always be seen as hypothetical cases.Hypothetical cases cannot be objective exceptions to the for-EENS passages.
The duality was there for Cardinal Richard Cushing and the Jesuits present at Vatican Council II but we don't have to use their approach which is based upon a mistake.It is the mistake of confusing what is invisible as being visible, implicit as being explict,unknown as being known.
This was the original mistake of Cardinal Cushing, the Jesuts and the Holy Office in the Fr.Leonard Feeney case.The Boston Heresy Case, as the secular media called it, was really the heresy of Cushing, the Jesuits and the Holy Office(CDF).The liberal theologians then wrongly interpreted Mystici Corporis, Quanta Cura and the old catechisms with this false reasoning. When the popes and saints referred to BOD, BOB and I.I the liberal theologians interpreted them as referring to physically visible non Catholics saved outside the Church.The popes and saints knew that BOD, BOB and I.I could only be hypothetical cases and so were not exceptions to EENS.
Pope Pius XII and Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre did not correct the error.World War II had ended, the new state of Israel was created and they may not have wanted any more tension with the Zionists at that time.
Today we can undo all their bad work and interpret Vatican Council II and EENS rationally.
Hypothetical cases( BOD, BOB and I.I, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc) are not exceptions to the old interpretation of EENS.So there is no rational theology to support the new ecumenism which says other Christians do not need to convert, since there is alleged known salvation outside the Catholic Church.
There are no personally known cases of non Catholics saved outside the Church.We cannot see or meet someone saved without faith and baptism.So when there are no visible cases there are no exceptions to EENS.Someone who is not there is just not there.
NO KNOWN DISMAS TODAY
Dismas, the Good Thief at the time of Christ is not a visible exception to EENS in 2019. We do not and cannot know of any Dismas' in the present times.Someone in the past cannot be an objective exception to EENS in the present times.
For someone to be an exception to EENS he must exist and be known in the present times.A possibility in the past or future is not a real person in the present times(2019).
There is no known case of a St. Emerentiana today and no one saw her in Heaven without the baptism of water.Ecclesiastical Masonry would support St. Emerentiana and Dismas being an exception to EENS.Traditionalists have not seen through the bad reasoning.
It is Cushingism to assume that physically invisible people are visible exceptions to the traditional teaching on there being exclusive salvation in only the Catholic Church.
The apologists John Hardon, Msgr.Clifford Fenton, Ludwig Ott and Fr.William Most were all Cushingites.BOD, BOB and I.I referred to personally known people saved outside the Church for them.Today even Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke, Cardinal Walter Brandmuller, Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Msgr.Nicola Bux are Cushingites.Their interpretation of Vatican Council II, their reasoning is supported by the Left and Ecclesiastical Masonry.
So we have a leftist CDF today which is not choosing the non political and rational interpretation of Vatican Council II, which would be in harmony with the strict interpretation of EENS.
This is the reason why Archbishop Augustine Di Noia told the leftist newspaper La Stampa, a few years back, during the doctrinal talks with the Society of St.Pius, that, the outcome of the talks would not affect Jewish Left-Vatican good relations. He meant there would only be the political interpretation of Vatican Council II which would create a rupture with Tradition ( EENS, Syllabus of Errors, ecumenism of return etc).
He should know by now that it is Vatican Council II (AG 7, LG 14) and the Catechism of the Catholic Church (846) which indicate that in Heaven there are only Catholics and outside the Church, there is no salvation.
-Lionel Andrades
Pope Pius XII and Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre did not correct the error.World War II had ended, the new state of Israel was created and they may not have wanted any more tension with the Zionists at that time.
Today we can undo all their bad work and interpret Vatican Council II and EENS rationally.
Hypothetical cases( BOD, BOB and I.I, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc) are not exceptions to the old interpretation of EENS.So there is no rational theology to support the new ecumenism which says other Christians do not need to convert, since there is alleged known salvation outside the Catholic Church.
There are no personally known cases of non Catholics saved outside the Church.We cannot see or meet someone saved without faith and baptism.So when there are no visible cases there are no exceptions to EENS.Someone who is not there is just not there.
NO KNOWN DISMAS TODAY
Dismas, the Good Thief at the time of Christ is not a visible exception to EENS in 2019. We do not and cannot know of any Dismas' in the present times.Someone in the past cannot be an objective exception to EENS in the present times.
For someone to be an exception to EENS he must exist and be known in the present times.A possibility in the past or future is not a real person in the present times(2019).
There is no known case of a St. Emerentiana today and no one saw her in Heaven without the baptism of water.Ecclesiastical Masonry would support St. Emerentiana and Dismas being an exception to EENS.Traditionalists have not seen through the bad reasoning.
It is Cushingism to assume that physically invisible people are visible exceptions to the traditional teaching on there being exclusive salvation in only the Catholic Church.
The apologists John Hardon, Msgr.Clifford Fenton, Ludwig Ott and Fr.William Most were all Cushingites.BOD, BOB and I.I referred to personally known people saved outside the Church for them.Today even Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke, Cardinal Walter Brandmuller, Bishop Athanasius Schneider and Msgr.Nicola Bux are Cushingites.Their interpretation of Vatican Council II, their reasoning is supported by the Left and Ecclesiastical Masonry.
So we have a leftist CDF today which is not choosing the non political and rational interpretation of Vatican Council II, which would be in harmony with the strict interpretation of EENS.
This is the reason why Archbishop Augustine Di Noia told the leftist newspaper La Stampa, a few years back, during the doctrinal talks with the Society of St.Pius, that, the outcome of the talks would not affect Jewish Left-Vatican good relations. He meant there would only be the political interpretation of Vatican Council II which would create a rupture with Tradition ( EENS, Syllabus of Errors, ecumenism of return etc).
He should know by now that it is Vatican Council II (AG 7, LG 14) and the Catechism of the Catholic Church (846) which indicate that in Heaven there are only Catholics and outside the Church, there is no salvation.
-Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment