Why is it legal to slander the late Fr. Leonard Feeney and the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary at the St. Benedict Centers in the USA ? : there are no practical exceptions of BOD,BOB and I.I or LG 8, GS 22 etc to EENS

Why is it legal to slander the late Fr. Leonard Feeney and the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary at the St. Benedict Centers in the USA ?

Every one knows that there are no personally known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).This is common sense.We cannot meet or see someone in 2019 saved outside the Church in invincible ignorance(I.I), the baptism of desire(BOD) or the baptism of blood(BOB), with or without the baptism of water.

So Vatican Council II does not mention any one saved outside the Church, for us human beings. There can be no literal case of BOD, BOB and I.I or LG 8,LG 14, LG 16, UR 3,NA 2, GS 22 etc in 2019. There were none in 1965 and 1949 too.

So to suggest that there are physically visible cases of non Catholics saved in I.I. is deception.

There can be no such people in our reality.

Yet Brother Casey Cole ofm, in his video Is there Salvation Outside the Church (7:29) 1 says Feeneyism is a condemned teaching in the Church and has posted a picture of Fr. Leonard Feeney.

Bishop Donald Sanborn has posted an Anti-Feeneyite Catechism. He assumes that the baptism of desire etc are exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.In other words they are not invisible and hypothetical but personally known and physically visible, in the present times.

This is false information.

Similarly Bishop Peter Libasci, bishop of the Diocese of Manchester, USA and the two Secretaries of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, Archbishops Giacomo Morandi and Augustine di Noia, have made the same error. They have also informed Brother Andre Marie MICM, Prior at the St. Benedict Center, New Hampshire, in the Diocese of Manchester,about their irrational reasoning and non traditional conclusion.For them there are objective exceptions to the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS. They interpret hypothetical cases mentioned in the Catechism of the Catholic Church and Vatican Council II as being exceptions to EENS. So they are not hypothetical for them.

Do they personally know of any particular person saved outside the Church, without faith and baptism (AG 7 ) and with BOD, BOB and I.I in the present times ? No.They cannot judge that any particular person outside the Church is saved.Since this would only be known to God.

The CDF, the Diocese of Manchester, Bishop Donald Sanborn and the Franciscans have been informed through these blog posts on EucharistandMission that they are irrational. Even worse, heretical.

The Diocese  of Manchester chooses the political interpretation of Vatican Council II and EENS to create a rupture with Tradition( Syllabus of Errors, ecumenism of return etc). They will not be honest and admit  that there are no known cases of BOD,BOB and I.I.So obviously BOD, BOB and I.I etc cannot exceptions to EENS.
Instead they have officially informed the St. Benedict Center in the diocese that they are legally not Catholic.Since they will not say that invisible cases of BOD,BOB and I.I are visible exceptions to EENS.Brother Andre Marie will not claim that unknown people saved,as referenced,  in LG 8, LG 16, UR 3 etc, are known exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.
They want him to be dishonest and deceptive.

This is all unethical and deceptive.Is this not illegal ?

How can they slander a priest by using an irrationality ?

BOD, BOB and I.I are 'zero cases' in our reality said the apologist John Martignoni.

BOD, BOB and I.I cannot be exceptions to EENS said Archbishop Thomas E. Gullickson, Nuncio to Switzerland and Liechtenstein.This is common knowledge which was also confirmed by Fr. Stefano Visintin osb, Rector, University of St. Anselm, Rome.Priests in Rome have said that the baptism of desire never was an exception to Feeneyite EENS. There are no cases of the baptism of desire.

So a lie is being promoted  and Fr. Leonard Feeney and the St. Benedict Centers are being slandered.

Why is this legal ?

If a pope or cardinal says invisible people are visible it still is irrational. 

If a pope or cardinal says that most people can see non Catholics saved in Heaven outside the Church (with BOD, BOB and I.I or LG 8, GS 22 etc as mentioned in Vatican Council II) it still is false.

If a pope violates the Principle of Non Contradiction it still is a violation.

When the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith makes an objective error and confuses what is invisible as being visible it still is an objective error. It is not Magisterial since the Holy Spirit cannot make an objective error. It is simply human error.

To assume there are non Catholics saved in Heaven outside the Church who are also visible on earth to be practical exceptions to EENS suggests that these people are in two places at the same time.

So if a few popes have overlooked this error it still is an error.

Why is it legal for Bishop Donald Sanborn, founder and rector of the Most Holy Family Seminary, Florida to slander Fr. Leonard Feeney and the St.Benedict Centers ?

Why is it legal for the Franciscans in New York ?

Why is it legal for Bishop Peter Libasci ? 

Are the Secretaries of the CDF legally allowed to violate the Principle of Non Contradiction and slander a priest ?

-Lionel Andrades

1

Cushingite Franciscan supports the innovation

  

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/03/the-franciscan-has-slandered-priest-fr.html

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/03/is-there-really-no-salvation-outside.html

2

http://mostholytrinityseminary.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Combined-Feeney-articles-red.pdf