This pontificate has shown us that a pope can make a doctrinal error on faith ( exclusive salvation negated with Cushingism) and morals ( Amoris Laetitia- Eucharist can be given to the divorced and remarried).

When the popes and the cardinals teach heresy and error it has to be corrected.
TWO ERRORS 

1.The popes since Pius XII assumed there was known, practical, literal, seen-in-the-flesh salvation outside the Catholic Church i.e without faith and the baptism of water( Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II).

2.So they concluded that not everyone needs to enter the Church for salvation. The baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance were some of the exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. So EENS, the Syllabus of Errors, Athanasius Creed etc were made obsolete.

So now when Catholics correct these two points they naturally and effortlessly go back to the Old Theology. The Syllabus of Errors and Athanasius Creed are no more obsolete.

These two errors of the popes were not identified and corrected when Michael Voris recently visited the St. Benedict Center(SBC) in New Hampshire.

These two errors constitute what is called the New Theology and what I call Cushingite Theology.

The underlying theology of Vatican Council II, Redemptoris Missio, Dominus Iesus, Balamand Declaration, Joint Declaration on Justification with the Lutherans etc is Cushingite.We have to re-read these Church documents without the error and then we return to the Old Theology, which I call Feeneyism.

With Feeneyism, the Old Theology, there are no exceptions to Michael Voris and Brother Andre Marie saying there is exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church and all need faith and baptism for salvation (AG 7). All.

There are no exceptions in Vatican Council II to the Catechism of Pope Pius X which says all need to be members of the Catholic Church to avoid Hell ( for salvation).

So this distinction was not made.Both Brother Andre Marie and Michael Voris were trying to be faithful to Cushngite theology and its new doctrines.They were not calling the new doctrines heresy but were trying to adapt to them. They needed to correct the error in the two ( red) points above.

The prohibitions on the SBC are based upon the New Theology while the two popes and the ecclesiastics at the Vatican, will not interpret Vatican Council II, with Feeneyism.For ideological reasons they cannot do so.

 But CMTV and SBC can go ahead and interpret Vatican Council II, with Feeneyism.Their conclusion would be non heretical and traditional.

Cushingites at the CDF cannot be magisterial. They assume BOD, BOB and I.I  are literal cases in 2019. The Holy Spirit cannot teach this. The Holy Spirit cannot make an objective mistake.

At the Plaquet Deo Press Conference last year Cardinal Luiz Ladaria, Prefect,CDF told a correspondent of the Associated Press that LG 8 was an exception to EENS i.e the Church no more had an exclusiveness and superiority in salvation.It was as if Cardinal Ladaria knew of someone  in Rome saved outside the Church.

Was this a mistake for CMTV and SBC? They do not discuss this point  when they refer to Plaquet Deo in the interview of Brother Andre Marie by Michael Voris.

This pontificate has shown us that a pope can make a doctrinal error  on faith ( exclusive salvation negated with Cushingism) and morals ( Amoris Laetitia- Eucharist can be given to the divorced and remarried).The SBC and CMTV cannot present doctrinal beliefs adapted to the error.-Lionel Andrades