To assume invisible cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance are visible exceptions to the dogma EENS ( extra ecclesiam nulla salus ) is human error.

Comments FR. FEENEY’S STRANGE DOCTRINE

• • −

  

  Greg Hebert • 10 hours ago

  "However, in the infallible 1964 council document Lumen Gentium,"
  "infallible"?

  2  

  •

  Reply

  •

  Share ›
  • 

    Jim Russell  Greg Hebert • 5 hours ago

    Yes, of course. The Church's universal teaching on faith and morals cannot be in 
  • error. Whatever the Council asserted doctrinally cannot be in error, and assuredly is not on the point at hand (LG 14).

  Lionel: To assume invisible cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance are visible exceptions to the dogma EENS ( extra ecclesiam nulla salus ) is human error.
• To then posit BOD, BOB and I.I as referring to known non Catholics saved outside the Church is human error.
• To use this reasoning in Lumen Gentium 14 was human error.
• -Lionel Andrades