What if he admitted that the ecclesiastics at the Vatican made a mistake ? They overlooked something which was important and there before their very eyes.They did not notice it.
What if he admits that the error could have been avoided and now the mistake will be corrected.The deception cannot be encouraged. As Catholics we have a duty to speak the truth before God.
What if Pope Benedict agrees with Pope Francis.It was an oversight on his part and the correction should have been made in 1965, or earlier.
If they do not affirm Vatican Council II( Feeneyite) the alternative will be to promote public heresy and mortal sin.
With Vatican Council II ( Cushingite), Lumen Gentium 16 ( invincible ignorance) and Lumen Gentium 14 ( case of the unknown catechumen), refers to personally known people saved outside the Catholic Church.So the Nicene Creed is changed to ' I believe in three or more personally known, baptisms for the forgiveness of sins, they are the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) and they all exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church'.They are personally known baptisms and so they are considered exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).
So what if Pope Francis says that this is clearly wrong and is not Catholic theology?
Will he ask the Church to switch to Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) ?
Then will the cardinals support him and say LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc in Vatican Council II, being hypothetical only, are not examples of salvation outside the Church in 1965 -2019.So they are not exceptions to the Athansius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation?
What if the pope says that this is rational even though it is traditional, it is being realistic and honest even though it is triumphalistic.
Could Pope Francis admit that he was wrong all these years on Vatican Council II and that the Council is something different, from how he was taught to interpret it as a Jesuit ?-Lionel Andrades
Then will the cardinals support him and say LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc in Vatican Council II, being hypothetical only, are not examples of salvation outside the Church in 1965 -2019.So they are not exceptions to the Athansius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation?
What if the pope says that this is rational even though it is traditional, it is being realistic and honest even though it is triumphalistic.
Could Pope Francis admit that he was wrong all these years on Vatican Council II and that the Council is something different, from how he was taught to interpret it as a Jesuit ?-Lionel Andrades
- Cushing heresy (5)
- Cushing-Jesuit Factual Error (22)
- Cushing-Jesuit Factual Error Examples in Vatican Council II(25)
- Cushingism (118)
- Cushingism and the Catholic popes(8)
- Cushingism at Vatican Council II(1)
- Cushingism in Vatican Council II(17)
- Cushingismo (6)
- Cushingite (3)
- Cushingite Bishops (1)
- Cushingite examples (1)
- Cushingite Franciscan supports the innovation (1)
- Cushingite passages cannot be exceptions to EENS (1)
- Cushingite propaganda on the Internet (1)
- Cushingite Theology (6)
- Cushingite Vatican Council II (1)
- Cushingite's strange doctrines (1)
- Cushingites (1)
- Cushingites must make the correction (1)
-
- Feeneyism (111)
- Feeneyism is the missing link (9)
- Feeneyism on Wikipedia (13)
- Feeneyism.Cushingism (7)
- Feeneyismo (10)
- Feeneyite can also affirm CCC 847-848. (1)
- Feeneyite Catechism of the Catholic Church 1995 (2)
- Feeneyite Catholic Church (1)
- Feeneyite Catholic College (1)
- Feeneyite EENS (2)
- Feeneyite EENS Vatican Council II(Feeneyite) (4)
- Feeneyite Theology (1)
- Feeneyite Vatican Council II (2)
- Feeneyite-Cushingite Model (1)
- Feeneyites (4)
- Feeneyites do not reject the Batptism of Desire (1)
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment