Like
the Dimand Brothers the Feenynites deny Baptism of Desire. If they are
right and the Holy Office of Pius XII (remember the head of the Holy
Office was the Pope) was wrong in condemning Benedict Center's
understanding of the Dogma No Salvation Outside of the Church then the
names of many Saints who were Martyrs names have to be removed. I can
assure you that the Feenynites do deny Baptism of Desire as I personally
know one of its members Charles Coloumbe because we went to the same
Mass on Sundays. And oddly enough even they prefer Latin Mass they go
so far to say the Novus Ordo Mass is both valid and licit. Though self
identified as traditional Catholics there is no doubt their
understanding of No Salvation Outside the Church is condemned by the
Church.
https://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php/headline-news-around-the-world/item/4293-st-benedict-center-too-catholic-to-be-catholic
Lionel: Feeneyites do not deny the baptism of desire, they say that it is hypothetical and so it is not an objective exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). Fr. Leonard Feeney said that there was no literal case of the baptism of desire(BOB).
Even the liberals and traditionalists admit that there is no case of the BOD in 2019. If there was someone saved outside the Church with BOD, it could only be known to God.
We cannot say that it is possible that were 20 non Catholics saved last year outside the Church with BOD or there were none.
Fr. Leonard Feeney was correct and the Holy Office 1949 during the pontificate of Pope Pius XII made an objective mistake.
The same mistake is made by Michael Matt at the Remant. He assumes that the baptism of desire is an exception to EENS. So in other words he implies that there are known cases of non Catholics saved outside the Church with BOD.
This is also the mistake of the SSPX bishops.
If Charles Colombe denies the baptism of desire he means that the baptism of desire is not an exception to EENS, there are no exceptions to EENS. He denies that there are exceptions to EENS.-Lionel Andrades
https://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php/headline-news-around-the-world/item/4293-st-benedict-center-too-catholic-to-be-catholic
https://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php/headline-news-around-the-world/item/4293-st-benedict-center-too-catholic-to-be-catholic
Lionel: Feeneyites do not deny the baptism of desire, they say that it is hypothetical and so it is not an objective exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). Fr. Leonard Feeney said that there was no literal case of the baptism of desire(BOB).
Even the liberals and traditionalists admit that there is no case of the BOD in 2019. If there was someone saved outside the Church with BOD, it could only be known to God.
We cannot say that it is possible that were 20 non Catholics saved last year outside the Church with BOD or there were none.
Fr. Leonard Feeney was correct and the Holy Office 1949 during the pontificate of Pope Pius XII made an objective mistake.
The same mistake is made by Michael Matt at the Remant. He assumes that the baptism of desire is an exception to EENS. So in other words he implies that there are known cases of non Catholics saved outside the Church with BOD.
This is also the mistake of the SSPX bishops.
If Charles Colombe denies the baptism of desire he means that the baptism of desire is not an exception to EENS, there are no exceptions to EENS. He denies that there are exceptions to EENS.-Lionel Andrades
https://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php/headline-news-around-the-world/item/4293-st-benedict-center-too-catholic-to-be-catholic
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment