The Westminster Diocese in their mission and catechesis programs present a lie on Catholic theology and doctrine. It is
un-ethical.This is official deception.
They use unethical and irrational Cushingism as a theology to interpret Vatican Council II.So the Council emerges as a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Feeneyite).
They
will not interpret Vatican Council II with the theology of Feeneyism
which is rational, traditional and does not use a false premise.They are
aware that if they did so then Vatican Council would be in harmony with
the past ecclesiocentrism of the Church.
UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL UN-ETHICAL
The
same error is made by the University of Bristol on a video available on
their website.Gavin D'Costa uses the theology of Cushingism to suggest
that there are known cases of non Catholics saved with 'that ray of the
Truth'(NA 2), which enlightens all people. So there is salvation outside the Church for him and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus has been discarded.It is no more absolutist for them.They interpret the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus also with some variation of Cushingism.
Even
after being informed Gavin D'Costa repeats the Jewish Left narrative
for the Catholic Church.He does not say that Nostra Aetate 4 says
Catholics are the new people of God, Catholics are the new Chosen
People, they are a continuation of the Jewish religion.Neither does he
state that Ad Gentes 7 indicates all Jews and other non Catholics,
Muslims included, are on the way to Hell unless they enter the Church as
members.In this way he keeps his job at the university with the approval of the Cardinal at Westminster.
They could have said that hypothetical cases mentioned in Vatican Council II
(LG 16, LG 14, LG 8, NA 2 etc) and the Letter of the Holy Office 1949
to the Archbishop of Boston relative to Fr.Leonard Feeney ( baptism of
desire(BOD) and invincible ignorance (I.I)) are not exceptions
to EENS.This is something obvious.It is common sense. We do not know
any one on earth or Heaven saved as such even if claims are made to the
contrary.But they have to lie for whatever reason known to him.Gaudium et Specs 22 is a hypothetical case.Lumen Gentium 16 (invincible ignorance) also refers to a hypothetical case.They never were an exception to the dogma EENS.These passages are not relevant to EENS.Zero cases of something are not exceptions to the dogma EENS says the apologist John Martignoni.BOD
and I.I are not exceptions to EENS says Fr.Stefano Visintin osb, Vice
Rector at the Pontifical University of St.Anselm, Rome and former Dean
of Theology.
-Lionel Andrades
June 12, 2019
June 12, 2019
Gavin D'Costa has not denied that he uses a false reasoning, which is factually and objectively incorrect
Gavin D'Costa comes across as professionally unethical.His irrationality would not be accepted by academics in England
Gavin D'Costa presents an irrational view of the Catholic Faith
to the Islamic Society of the University of Bristol and visiting Muslim
professors
Muslim
professors must know exactly what are the teachings of the Catholic
Church about Islam and other religions, before and after Vatican Council
II
October 7, 2014
Department of Theology and Religious Studies at the University of Bristol is still teaching an irrationality : even after being informed
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/10/department-of-theology-and-religious.html
May 31, 2014
Joseph Shaw, Gavin D'Costa obedient to Cardinal Vince Nicols are misleading lay Catholics
May 29, 2014
Cardinal Nicols and FIUV are telling a falsehood. Why do rank and file Catholics have to accept it?
May 20, 2014
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment