The Bologna School interprets Vatican Council II with the red being an exception to the blue and Fr. John Zuhlsdorf says he supports this interpretation.He has not written about how Vatican Council II can be interpreted with the red not being an exception to the blue.

The Bologna School interprets Vatican Council II with the red being an exception to the blue and Fr. John Zuhlsdorf says he supports this interpretation.He has not written about how Vatican Council II can be interpreted with the red not being an exception to the blue.

Since 1965 Vatican Council II is wrongly being interpreted with the red being an exception to the blue and non one has corrected the error.

The sedevacantists Michael and Peter Dimond at the Most Holy Family Monastery, USA still interpret Vatican Council II with the red being an exception to the blue.This is inspite of so many reports on line on this subject and  e-mails sent to them.

Similarly sedevacatists Bishop Donald Sanborn at his seminary in Florida will not state that Vatican Council II and other magisterial documents can be interpreted with the red not being an exception to the blue.

In the Diocese of Manchester, USA the sedevacantist community, Congregatio Mariae Reginau Immaculatae(CMRI),under Bishop Mark Pivarunas, also interpret Vatican Council II with the red being an exception to the blue.

Similarly Bishop Williamson and the SSPX groups do not discuss this issue and correct the error in public.

The Diocese of Manchester needs to help the CMRI community and not condemn as not being Catholic.They have to be shown that with the red not being an exception to the blue, the Council does not contradict the past ecclesiology and the Syllabus of Errors.So then there is no reason for the CMRI to go into sedevacantism based upon Vatican Council II.

-Lionel Andrades