Fr.Marco Hausmann who only offers the Traditional Latin Mass,like many priests of the Franciscans of the Immaculate, and who has been removed from the church San Giuseppe a Capo le Case, in central Rome, is telling us that Vatican Council II does not contradict the past exclusivist ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return, the Syllabus of Errors and the Athanasius Creed. He affirms Tradition and the Council.
The Austrian activist priest, now targeted by the pro-Left Bishop Gian Rico Ruzza, told me a few years back that he personally, like me, did not know of any one saved outside the Church with BOD,BOB and I.I or LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22, AG 11 etc,1 in Vatican Council II. We can speculate and hope that there are possibilities of non Catholics saved outside the Church- but there are no actual cases known to us humans.They can only be known to God.
The priest from whom Fr. Marco took over, Mons. Ignacio Barreiro, as Spiritual Director of the Militia Christi,is really saying that Vatican Council II can no more be cited by the liberals, as a break with Tradition. It can no more be a theological opening for a New Theology, New Ecumenism, New Evangelisation and New Ecclesiology. Why? Since there are no concrete exceptions to the past ecclesiocentric ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.
Vatican Council II supports the past eccclesiology(AG 7, LG 14) and there are no practical exceptions mentioned in the Council-text.
This is a refutation of the Abu Dhabi Declaration, the Balamand Declaration and the Joint Declaration on Justification with the Lutherans.Outside the Church there is no salvation(AG 7, LG 14).
It means the interpretation of Vatican Council II by Bishop Gian Ricco Ruzza, Secretary General of the Vicariate, Rome, is irrational and a rupture with Tradition. It is heretical.Since it rejects the Athanasius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation.It is also schism with the past popes before Pius XII, who affirmed the Athanasius Creed. It is also a rupture with the Magisterium of the 16th century and their concept of mission, the Nicene and Apostles Creed , the Catechism of Pope Pius X etc. Magisterial documents are rejected when the Vicariate and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) assume there are personally known non Catholics saved outside the Church with BOD, BOB or I.I or as referred to in LG 8 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc.
When Fr. Marco Hausmann, along with Fr. Stefano Visintin osb, the present Rector of the University of St. Anselm, Rome, say there are no personally known cases of BOD, BOB and I.I or LG 8 etc,k in the present times(1965-2019) they contradict Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj, Prefect of the CDF. At the Placuet Deo , Press Conference last year. Cardinal Ladaria when asked a question , said the Church no more claims to have a superiority and exclusiveness in salvation and cited Lumen Gentium 8.
Fr. Marco Hausmann, like Archbishop Thomas E. Gullickson,U.S Nuncio to Switzerland and Liechtenstein,and many priests in Rome who offer Holy Mass in Italian, admits the obvious -there are no known cases of BOD, BOB and I.I.
BOD, BOB and I.I are 'zero cases' said the apologist John Martignoni who has a program on EWTN.
So Hausmann is taking the Church in a new direction he is asking to put aside the 'old interpretation' of Vatican Council II and choose a 'new interpretation' which is rational, traditional, non heretical and in harmony with the old ecclesiology of the popes over the centuries.
-Lionel Andrades
1
BOD(Baptism of desire),BOB(Baptism of Blood) and I.I(Invincible ignorance) or LG 8(Lumen Gentium 8), LG 14(Lumen Gentium 14), LG 16(Lumen Gentium 16), UR 3(Unitatis Redintigratio 3), NA 2(Nostra Aetate 2), GS 22(Gaudium et Specs), AG 11(Ad Gentes 7-seeds of the Word) etc.
SEPTEMBER 29, 2019
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment