It is the same Vatican Council II but two different interpretations. So when you evangelise when you proclaim Jesus and salvation are there exceptions in Vatican Council II to John 3:5 and Mark 16:16?

Explain these blog posts to any one and he or she wil agree that there is nothing in the entire text of Vatican Council II to contradict an ecumenism of return, the past ecclesiology and the Syllabus of Errors.

There is nothing in Lumen Gentium-the Dogmatic Constitution of the Church-to contradict the understanding of Church according to the Magisterium and missionaries of the 16th century.Vatican Council II is dogmatic.It supports the old dogmas of the Catholic Church.

This is not how Pope Paul VI and Pope Benedict  interpreted the Council but what I am saying here is there in the Council-text.It is always there before you.

Archbishop Lefebvre  did not know this.Cardinal Ottaviani did not know this.The SSPX bishops even after being informed are afraid to admit it.

The Council-text is there before us.We can look at LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as being exceptions or not being exceptions to an ecumenism of return, the past ecclesiology and the Syllabus of Errors.

Are they exceptions or are they not exceptions for you? 

For me they are not exceptions but for Archbishop Lefebvre, in the past, and Archbishop Giacomo Morandi,Secretary of the Congregation for the Doctrine for the Faith(CDF),today, they are exceptions.

For Brother Andre Marie MICM, Prior, St. Benedict Center, NH, USA, they are not exceptions but for Archbishop Augustine di Noia,Adjunct Secretary,of the CDF they are exceptions.

It is the same Vatican Council II but two different interpretations. So when you evangelise when you proclaim Jesus and salvation are there exceptions in Vatican Council II to John 3:5 and Mark 16:16?-Lionel Andrades