Michael Matt has an article which does not affirm Vatican Council II in harmony with Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus and this is heresy and schism.His donors must know that he rejects EENS, the Athanasius Creed on EENS, the Syllabus of Errors in harmony with EENS and Vatican Council II and the Catechisms in harmony with EENS etc.

Michael Matt has an article which does not affirm Vatican Council II in harmony with Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus and this is heresy and schism.His donors must know that he rejects EENS, the Athanasius Creed on EENS, the Syllabus of Errors in harmony with EENS and Vatican Council II and the Catechisms in harmony with EENS etc.

                                        https://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php

 The past ecclesiology and ecumenism of return is rejected.Instead he chooses to interpret Vatican Council II only as a rupture with the past and then makes a big thing about it.

Those who send their money to him must know that he rejects EENS, the Athanasius Creed on EENS, the Syllabus of Errors etc by interpreting Vatican Council II with a false premise and inference to create a rupture with Tradition. He does this since he does not want to affirm Feeneyite EENS by interpreting the Council without the false premise.

So donors could be giving their money to Cardinal Koch and Kasper who also interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise and not without it.This is public heresy and a mortal sin of faith.

'To Hell with Vatican Council II' pleases the liberals and Masons.They also allow Michael Matt to produce Remnant News and TV.

But if he said that Vatican Council II only supports the Syllabus of Errors,the Athanasius Creed, the past exclusivist ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return, there will be accusations of political hate, Anti Semitism etc.Matt would be a bigot and fundamentalist.

So Michael Matt like his  publishing father chooses to only interpret the Council  as a rupture  with the past and everyone applauds.In this way the enemies of the Church do not come for his bank balance.

He brings up non issues and does not affirm the faith.It is the same with the other Lefebvrist traditionalists.

But this is not traditionalism.It is heresy and schism and it is approved by the Left.

I mentioned in a previous blog post  that Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre did n ot teach Catholic doctrine  at his seminary.Since he interpreted magisterial documents  with a false premise to create a rupture with traditional EENS, the past ecclesiology etc.Michael Matt does not prove me wrong.He does not say that he  affirms the past ecclesiology and traditional EENS like the 16th century. He does not say that the baptism of desire( BOD), baptism of blood (BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) are not exceptions to EENS. He does not say LG 8 etc are not exceptions to traditional EENS.
No. 
He has had so many opportunities to say it but will not.
Since they will come for him if he does so.
He has to deny the Faith to be allowed on the media. It is obligatory for Matt  to say BOD, BOB and I.I are exceptions to EENS if he wants to keep the Remant.

So he issues another strong statement undermining Vatican Council II, intepreted with a false premise, but will not support Vatican Council II interpreted without the false premise. Even though his attention has been called to this error, so many times, he continues to play these games for  years.

Lumen Gentium does not contradict EENS for me but for him it has to contradict EENS if he wants to be the editor of the Remant, where they can criticize Pope Francis but not the influential Left.

He has to assume invisible cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22  are visible for him and then he can condemn the Council with his 'To Hell with Vatican Council '.

-Lionel Andrades