I hope Steve Bannon has not read Joseph Clifford Fenton, Archbishop Lefebvre, Michael Davies, Robert dei Mattei, Chris Ferrara and John Vennari and also Joseph Ratzinger and Cardinal Kasper.This is asking too much. But there is a mistake in the writings of these traditionalists and liberals.They support the Leftist ideology and prevent the Church from going back to Tradition. It is still possible to go back to Tradition and have a unity in our faith with one small move. Bannon and Harnwell have to interpret Vatican Council II as not being an exception to Tradition.

I hope Steve Bannon has not read Joseph Clifford Fenton, Archbishop Lefebvre, Michael Davies, Robert dei Mattei, Chris Ferrara and John Vennari and also Joseph Ratzinger and Cardinal Kasper.This is asking too much. But there is a mistake in the writings of these traditionalists and liberals.They support the Leftist ideology and prevent the Church from going back to Tradition. It is still possible to go back to Tradition and have a unity in our faith with one small move.Bannon and Harnwell  have to interpret Vatican Council II as not being an exception to Tradition.

I have read their writings, encrustations on the faith, and if Bannon too has done the same, I would suggest he put it out of his mind and look at the issue anew.Otherwise he will not be able to understand what I say.

The primary mistake all of them have made is to see 'what is not there' as 'being there', to picture the 'invisible' as being' visible'. Once this error is corrected we are back to the 16th century Magisterium and missionaries.We have taken the ecclesiology back in one simple move.

 

 There is no need of organizing educational projects as was planned by Bannon and  Benjamin Harnwell and were blocked by the Left.

Only one simple theoretical action is needed and things will right itself. It's like watering the roots of a tree.One simple action and all areas of the tree(leaves, branches) are nourished.

That one simple action is recognizing that BOD, BOB and I.I 1 in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case and LG 8,LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc  2  in Vatican Council II always refer to hypothetical cases, invisible people, non existing exceptions to the past exclusive ecclesiology  with an exclusive salvation theology.There is no known salvation outside the Church. We cannot physically meet or see someone saved outside the Catholic Church. We cannot see exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) or EENS according to St.Robert Bellarmine, St. Ignatius of Loyola and St.Francis Xavier.

So with one simple move-correcting the way we look at  things- Bannon's Dignitatis Institute can take the Church back to its old theology and salvation-doctrines.-Lionel Andrades


1
 BOD( unknown cases of a non Catholic saved outside the Church without the baptism of water but with an alleged baptism of desire) , BOB( the unknown case of a person saved as a Catholic martry but without the baptism of water),  I.I ( the personally unknown case of a non Catholic saved outside the Catholic Church without faith and baptism).

 2
 LG 8( the personally unknown case of a non Catholic saved without faith and baptism and instead of elements of sanctification and truth in other religions) , LG 14( the personally unknown case of a non Catholic saved with the desire for the baptism of water, before death, which he or she did not receive and still was saved), LG 16 ( the personally unknown case of a non Catholic saved in invincible ignorance), UR 3 ( the physically invisible case of a Christian saved outside the Catholic Church), NA 2 ( the specifically unknown case of a non Christian or Catholic saved outside the Church with good and holy things in other religions) , GS 22 ( the case of a person whose name and surname is not known who has hypothetically been saved outside the Catholic Church with good will ).