Joseph Shaw and the other professors( fellows) at the St. Benet Hall, Oxford University interpret Vatican Council II irrationally since it is politically correct with the Left which dominates the University and academics in England.
I mentioned in a blog post yesterday that the St.Benet's
Hall at Oxford University and the Latin Mass Society and Una Voce
International interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and need to make
the change.Dr.Joseph Shaw teaches philosophy at the St.Bennet
Hall.He is also the Chairman of the Latin Mass Society of England and
Wales.He has written working papers for Una Voce International.
For him and other traditionalists LG
8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II, should refer to hypothetical cases only
in 2019. They are not real and known non Catholics saved outside the
Church. So they are not exceptions to Tradition(Syllabus of Errors, Athanasius Creed etc).
So Lumen Gentium does not contradict the past ecclesiology.But this is not how the Council is interpreted at St. Benet Hall.
So Lumen Gentium does not contradict the past ecclesiology.But this is not how the Council is interpreted at St. Benet Hall.
LG 16 and GS 22 are not practical exceptions to
Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus and there is nothing in
Unitatis Redintigratio to contradict an ecumenism of return. Yet this is not how the Council is interpreted by Joseph Shaw and the other professors in England.
Usually
the books and reports interpret Vatican Council II irrationally to
create an artifical rupture with Tradition. This is the error of the liberals and Lefebvrists. -Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment