Every morning when I come to the Internet at a public library in Rome I check Fr. John Zuhlsdorf's blog.I also check Spirit Daily and a few other blogs.I realize that millions of people do the same.
Happy 14th Birthday, Blog!
Since I started keeping stats, on 23 November 2006, I have had about 95 million page views and 62.6 million unique visits.
Dear readers, please accept my thanks for everything, your comments and feedback, your prayers and your patience with me.-Fr.John Zuhlsdorf . 1
He has the attention of the liberals and the traditionalists and is kept informed by his readers.He does not write on how Vatican Council II is in harmony with with the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and so the Council is really traditional.
He does not want to touch this subject.
He does not affirms on EENS like the late Fr. Nicholas Gruner and so does not have problem being registered and accepted in a diocese.There were times when Fr. Gruner was Feeneyite on EENS and at other times he was Cushingite.
However the Vatican assumed he was Feeneyite on EENS.
Fr.Z is free to offer Holy Mass anywhere since he affirms the liberal interpretation of Vatican Council II, with the false premise.He is not considered a traditionalist like Fr. Gruner, who only knew about Vatican Council II, Cushingite, and so rejected the Council. He was correct. Vatican Council II, Cushingite is heretical.
Recently Fr. Z chose to interpret Lumen Gentium 14 as a break with Feeneyite EENS.He is comfortable with this error.He keeps repeating it even after being informed.
But we all still have to read Fr. Z.
When will he tell Massimo Faggioli and Michael Sean Winters that Vatican Council II, Feeneyite and not Cushingite, Vatican Council II without the false premise and not with it, supports Fr. Leonard Feeney on EENS ?-Lionel Andrades
1
_____________________________
MARCH 2, 2018
Fr.John Zuhlsdorf - Don't Touch
Placiut Deo is a heretical document since Cardinal Ladaria interprets Vatican Council II with the for and against EENS method instead of the for and neutral to EENS interpretation.So the result is a rupture with extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and Tradition in general.
Yet this is how Fr. John Zuhlsdorf also interprets magisterial documents. So he is not going to comment upon this point.
For him invisible cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood (BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) are visible and objective exceptions to tradtional EENS. So like Cardinal Ladaria and Bishop Morlino he will not comment on Placiut Deo proclaiming Jesus without the need for membership in the Catholic Church for salvation.
On his blog he has placed a screen shot of the CDF Letter and another which says Don't touch, which is his motto on this subject.
The journalists at the Press Conference did not touch the error of Cardinal Ladaria when he projected Lumen Gentium 8 as an exception to the old teaching on exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.They too interpret Vatican Council II like Fr. John Zuhlsdorf. It is not the for and neutral to EENS approach.
Similarly the conservative bloggers today have not reported on how Vatican Council II(LG 8) would be in harmony with the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS with the for and neutral interpretation of Vatican Councl II -text.
This approach would be a nightmare for the liberal theologians who have controlled theology and changed doctrine with this simple ruse.They continue with it even after being informed.-Lionel Andrades
This approach would be a nightmare for the liberal theologians who have controlled theology and changed doctrine with this simple ruse.They continue with it even after being informed.-Lionel Andrades
________________________________
APRIL 13, 2018
Where is Fr.John Zuhlsdorf's Catholic Identity ?
Gallup Poll points to future demographic disaster. Wherein Fr. Z rants. by Fr.John Zuhlsdorf
The result: erosion of Catholic identity.
Lionel: Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) is in harmony with Vatican Council II,all the Catechisms and the popes on this subject.The Church still affirms the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS in its magisterial documents interpreted rationally. This is our Catholic Identity.
____________________
And if we don’t know who we are, why should anyone pay attention to us except to crush out what we could be were we to get our act together again?
Lionel: Fr. Z does not affirm Feeneyite EENS in harmony with Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and all Magisterial documents interpreted without the irrational premise. He does not have a fixed and traditional Catholic identity.So how can he convey it to others ? It is the same problem with others priests.
_____________________
We must NOW….
- purify celebrations of the Novus Ordo of their aberrations and bring them back into harmony with tradition and do what the Council asked regarding music, etc.
____________________________
- expand the use of the traditional form of Mass in many more places
____________________
- bring formation of priests into continuity with our past while looking forward, which will include actually obeying Canon Law about Latin and Aquinas and attending to what is laid down in the Congregation for Educations document about Patristic studies, etc.
For example St. Thomas Aquinas affirmed the traditional, strict interpretation of the dogma EENS.He said that the man in the forest in ignorance, who was to be saved would have God sending him a preacher. So he would be baptised when he was in Heaven. The liberal theologians interpret the man in the forest as being a known person saved outside the Church. The traditionalists accept this.
This is not our Catholic Identity.
So when the Catholic Identity is not conveyed to Catholics in general they do not have it.
__________________________
- get down on our knees and do penance, openly, publicly, with bishops and priests even lying flat on their faces on the steps of their cathedrals begging God to forgive our collective stupidity and offenses against Christ’s Sacred Heart and Mary’s Immaculate Heart.
Lionel: Do this after the Faith is proclaimed with truth and integrity. Affirm Feeneyite EENS and also Vatican Council II and all the Catechisms.
___________________________
Lionel: To change the meaning of extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the understanding of the Nicene Creed is a mortal sin of faith. To interpret Vatican Council II with a falsehood and deception, as Fr. Z does, is a sin.
-Lionel Andrades
http://wdtprs.com/blog/2018/04/gallup-poll-points-to-future-demographic-disaster-wherein-fr-z-rants/
____________________________
NOVEMBER 19, 2018
Bishop Robert C.Morlino and Fr.John Zuhlsdorf must end the scandal
Bishop Robert C.Morlino, of the diocese of Madison and Fr. John Zuhlsdorf, like the bishops of Palermo, Italy, are also in heresy and schism and Canon Law must apply to them. They administer the Sacraments in sacrilege and need to rectify the scandal in public.They have been informed about this in the past.So they know.
1.They have rejected the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) by deceptively assuming unknown cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance)I.I) are known exceptions in the present times (1965-2018), to the dogma EENS. So the de fide teaching on EENS approved by three Church Councils is obsolete for them.This is heresy.It is also schism with the past popes on EENS.They also reject Vatican Council II(AG 7) which supports the strict interpretation of EENS, when LG 8, LG 16, UR 3 etc are interpreted as being only hypothetical cases.
How can Bishop Morlino hold his office as bishop when he rejects the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation with an irrational premise( invisible non Catholics are visible) and irrational inference ( these 'visible' people are objective examples of salvation outside the Church and so practical exceptions to EENS).
2.Since BOD, BOB and I.I are practical exceptions to EENS for Bishop Morlino and Fr. Z. they have changed the understanding of the Nicene Creed.1 This again is heresy.It is schism with the past popes. Here we have first class heresy and the stuff of automatic excommunication.Canon law is applicable here.
3.Since BOD,BOB and I.I are literal exceptions to EENS for those holding juridical officies according to Canon Law in the diocese of Madison,USA, they have also rejected the Athanasius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation.According to Canon Law this is a violation and an offence.Eligibility for the juridical position ends.A juridical person must affirm all the teachings of the Catholic Church.So in the diocese of Madison, they need to resign or end the scandal.
4.Since BOD,BOB and I.I are exceptions to EENS, implying outside the Church there is known salvation, for the Rectors, Superiors, Curia officials, Canonists, Catechists and school principals, they interpret all the Catechisms and Vatican Council II irrationally.This is done even when a rational option exists and they have been informed . So the Catechisms and Vatican Council II for them, are not in harmony with the strict interpretation of EENS, as it was known to the Magisterium in the 16th century. There is also a rupture with the past ecclesiology, which held that salvation is exclusive and all need to be members of the Catholic Church to avoid Hell.It is a rupture with the Syllabus of Errors, on an ecumenism of return since now there is known salvation outside the Church.There is a break with traditional Mission, based on no known salvation outside the Church.The family and marriages are hit since now inter-faith marriages are possible since there is alleged known salvation outside the Church.A non Catholic spouse it is assumed will be saved .
Their interpretation of the Vatican Council II and the Catechism is different from mine .I do not use a false premise to create heresy and schism which is approved by the Left.
Bishop Morlino and Fr. Z.,like the bishops of Palermo, have committed a mortal sin of faith.They must end the scandal in public before they administer the Sacraments and offer Holy Mass in Latin.
FALSE ECCLESIOLOGY AND FALSE CHRISTOLOGY
FALSE ECCLESIOLOGY AND FALSE CHRISTOLOGY
There are no known exceptions to their false ecclesiology and also there are no known exceptions to traditional Christology and salvation theology.
We do not know of any one saved by Jesus outside the visible boundaries of the Catholic Church.Similarly if someone theoretically, hypothetically, for them, is assumed to be saved outside the Church it would really only be known to God.For us humans there is no extraordinary means of salvation. The ordinary means of salvation is faith and baptism in the Catholic Church(AG 7,LG 14).
5.Since there is alleged known salvation outside the Church for them with BOD,BOB and I.I and LG 8, LG 16, GS 22 etc referring to personally known non Catholics, they cannot proclaim the need for the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation in the USA and the non separation of Church and State,which was based on no known salvation outside the Church.-Lionel Andrades
1
Tracy Rowland, Fr. John Zuhlsdorf and Bishop Morlino in the Diocese of Madison, USA are 'doing theology' with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism
https://gloria.tv/article/3b3kGDSEWX9F1H2TvHVepvtkv
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment