Tuesday, December 24, 2019

Pope Francis New Evangelisation rejects the Gospel on mission and salvation,interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise, and changes doctrine with a false theology
















Pope Francis in his New Evangelisation address refers to the Gospel. But in John 3:35 Jesus says all need the baptism of water for salvation.The pope does not mention this. In Mark 16:16 Jesus says those who do not believe will be condemned.The pope does not mention this.In Matt.7:13 Jesus says enter through the narrow gate for the gate is wide that leads to Hell and most people take it.The pope does not mention this.The Gospel is rejected.
In the Gospel of John,Jesus speaks about the necessity of receiving the Eucharist for salvation and the pope does not mention this.Yet Pope Francis  suggests that his New Evangelisation is according to the Gospel. 
He briefly refers to Vatican Council II.But does not say that the Council  says all need faith and baptism for salvation.(Ad Gentes 7) In other words most people on earth are oriented to Hell, without faith and the baptism of water.
His New Evangelisation theology is based upon a false interpretation of Vatican Council II.It is a negation of the Gospel as it was interpreted by the popes and saints over history.It is a rupture on  mission and salvation.In this rejection of the Gospel, even the concept of mortal sins of faith and morals have been put aside.
 He mentions the Magisterium of Vatican Council II but is referring to Vatican Council II interpreted with Cushingism and not Feeneyism.This is the Council interpreted with a false premise to create a non traditional conclusion.
All this is tacitly approved by the liberal Pope Benedict.He also kept quiet when Pope Francis in his encyclical Lumen Fidei suggested that Protestants do not need to convert into the Catholic Church for salvation.They are part of the mystical body of Christ.This includes those whose religion officially allows them to abort and contracep.
The two popes have been saying that Jews do not need to convert now the pope has extended salvation to all mankind whom God has created in his image.
Pope Francis' New Evangelisation talk in Italian considers the whole world as people  of God and does not mention Hell.
The founders of the Jesuit community, St. Ignatius of Loyola and St. Francis Xavier's theology and doctrine on mission,  would be 'rigid' and unacceptable for this pope and the Masons.
So the doctrine on mission and salvation has been made obsolete for the pastoral mission centers formed in all the dioceses.For all of them there are alleged exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and this is the new theology in the Church since the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office.

DOCTRINE CHANGE
1.The concept of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) in the Church has been changed. They refer to physically visible persons saved outside the Catholic Church and not just hypothetical cases.This is how the New Theology and the Church gets its 'exceptions' to extra ecclesiam nulla salus(eens).
2. The past ecclesiology has been rejected. Since BOD, BOB and I.I are practical exceptions to EENS.
3. The Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors have been rejected by the two popes, since invisible cases of the BOD, BOB and I.I are visible exceptions to EENS for them.
4.Vatican Council II is not interpreted without the false premise i.e invisible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I are just invisible at all times. So they are not exceptions to EENS, the past ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.
5.The Catechisms are not interpreted without the false premise.Otherwise they would be in harmony with the the 'rigid' Tradition, of Ignatius, Aquinas and Augustine. 
6.The Creeds are not interpreted without the false premise. So now the whole Church is following first class heresy.The Profession of Faith is made meaningless.
7.Instead Magisterial documents, including Vatican Council II are interpreted with a false premise to create a new interpretation of the Gospels.It is a break with Sacred Tradition.
This is public heresy from the pope to the parish priest. The whole Church including cardinals and bishops have been following the error, since the time of Pope Paul VI (1965).
Pope Paul VI could have interpreted Vatican Council II without the false premise.He had a choice.The rest of the popes followed the error.
Pope Francis cites Redemptoris Missio which is based upon Cushingism and not Feeneyism, as a philosophy and theology. Cushingism is irrational and heretical. It causes the rupture with Tradition.It's use is unethical.
He cites Cardinal Carlo Martini who rejected the Church's teachings on faith and morals and is probably screaming today, where he is.
Pope Francis mentions migrants and does not believe that they are on the way to Hell, without faith and baptism(AG 7).Why proclaim Jesus when the rest of humanity for him are children of God who are all going to Heaven? Why do they need a Saviour? They are not going to Hell.
We have a pope who rejects the Gospel, Vatican Council II and  the Tradition of the popes and saints. He does not choose to interpret Magisterial documents without an irrational premise otherwise it would be pro-Tradition and rigid, for him and the Left.
The Holy Father uses buzz words and slogans ( Vatican Council II, integral development, Gospel) but over all is incoherent, being forced to enter what he calls ' a mystery',without traditional Catholic faith and morals.-Lionel Andrades







Posted by at
Labels:

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)