Saturday, July 6, 2019

Society of St. Pius X now has 658 priests and most of them interpret Vatican Council II with the red being an exception to the blue , mix up the small t for the big T , they use irrational Cushingism instead of rational Feeneyism , they use a false premise and inference to interpret magisterial documents when they can choose to avoid this irrationality , reject the Athanasius Creed with visible instead of invisible cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance, choose the right hand side column instead of the left hand side column to interpret the Catechisms including the Catechism of Pope Pius X and then call themselves traditionalists



The Society of St. Pius X now has 658 priests and most of them interpret Vatican Council II with the red being an exception to the blue 1, mix up the small t for the big T 2, they use irrational Cushingism instead of rational Feeneyism 3, they use a false premise and inference to interpret magisterial documents when they can choose to avoid this irrationality 4, reject the Athanasius Creed with visible instead of invisible cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance, choose the right hand side column instead of the left hand side column to interpret the Catechisms including the Catechism of Pope Pius X 5 and then call themselves traditionalists.-Lionel Andrades

1

JANUARY 28, 2019

In Magisterial documents the red is not an exception to the blue, thered does not contradict the blue : with the blue there is a hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition (16th - century extra ecclesium nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors, ecumenism of return, past exclusivist ecclesiology etc)   https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/01/in-magisterial-documents-red-is-not.html


2

JUNE 8, 2019


Catholics wrongly interpret Vatican Council II with the small 't' and assume it is the big 'T'  https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/06/catholics-wrongly-interpret-vatican.html

3.


Feeneyism: It is the old theology and philosophical reasoning which says there are no known exceptions past or present, to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).There are no explicit cases to contradict the traditional interpretation of EENS.It is practical. There obviously are no known cases of the baptism of desire (BOD),baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) in 2017.So there are no practical exceptions to EENS.Neither was BOD,BOB and I.I an exception to Feeneyite EENS in 1949 when the Letter of the Holy Office was issued to the Archbishop of Boston. The cardinals made an objective mistake. Mentioning BOD and I.I in Vatican Council II (AG 7,LG 14) along side the traditional teaching on exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church was superfluous.

Cushingism: It is the new theology and philosophical reasoning.It assumes there are known exceptions, past and present, to the dogma EENS, on the need for all to formally enter the Church.It assumes that the baptism of desire etc are not hypothetical but objectively known.In principle hypothetical cases are objective in the present times.

We now know more about Vatican Council II. It can be interpreted with the Cushingism or Feeneyism and the conclusion changes.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/when-will-rorate-caeili-learn.html


4.
NOVEMBER 21, 2018


Posted by at
Labels:

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)