eucharistandmission: An appeal must be made to Pope Francis to make an announcement on this issue : explain to Catholics the difference between Cushingism and Feeneyism as a theology

Saturday, January 18, 2020

An appeal must be made to Pope Francis to make an announcement on this issue : explain to Catholics the difference between Cushingism and Feeneyism as a theology

When a traditionalist or conservative Catholic says there are exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus he is also saying there are exceptions to the Athanasius Creed, on outside the Church there is no salvation. Then there are also exceptions to the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX on ecumenism and exclusive salvation.Then there will also be exceptions to the Nicene Creed, 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins' becomes I believe in three known baptisms for the forgiveness of sins and they all exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.' This is the fall out when there are exceptions to EENS.

So the traditionalists and conservative Catholics who say there are exceptions to EENS, are also saying that the Catechism of Pope Pius X contradicts itself.

For all of them 29 Q would contradict 16Q ( and the rest of the numbers in blue).It would be an exception.This is how they all interpret it today.

For me 29Q is not an exception to the numbers in blue.Since 29Q always refers to invisible cases for me.Always.

Image result for photo Catechism of Pope Pius X

From the Catechism of Pope Pius X

16 Q. Is Baptism necessary to salvation?

A. Baptism is absolutely necessary to salvation, for our Lord has expressly said:

"Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Ghost, he cannot enter into

the Kingdom of God."

The Church in Particular

9 Q. State distinctly what is necessary to be a member of the Church?

A. To be a member of the Church it is necessary to be baptised, to believe and

profess the teaching of Jesus Christ, to participate in the same Sacraments, and

to acknowledge the Pope and the other lawful pastors of the Church.

24 Q. To be saved, is it enough to be any sort of member of the Catholic Church?

A. No, to be saved it is not enough to be any sort of member of the Catholic

Church; it is necessary to be a living member.

27 Q. Can one be saved outside the Catholic, Apostolic and Roman Church?

A. No, no one can be saved outside the Catholic, Apostolic Roman Church,

just as no one could be saved from the flood outside the Ark of Noah,

which was a figure of the Church.

11 Q. Who are they who are outside the true Church?

A. Outside the true Church are: Infidels, Jews, heretics, apostates,

schismatics, and the excommunicated.

13 Q. Who are the Jews?

A. The Jews are those who profess the Law of Moses; have not received

baptism; and do not believe in Jesus Christ.

14 Q. Who are heretics?

A. Heretics are those of the baptised who obstinately refuse to believe some

truth revealed by God and taught as an article of faith by the Catholic

Church; for example, the Arians, the Nestorians and the various sects of Protestants.

29 Q. But if a man through no fault of his own is outside the Church, can he be saved?
A. If he is outside the Church through no fault of his, that is, if he is in good faith, and if he has received Baptism, or at least has the implicit desire of Baptism; and if, moreover, he sincerely seeks the truth and does God's will as best he can such a man is indeed separated from the body of the Church, but is united to the soul of the Church and consequently is on the way of salvation-Catechism of Pope Pius X

It would also mean the Catechism of the Council of Trent would contradict itself with Cushingism.

The same problem would be there with the interpretation of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I). There would also be a rupture with BOD, BOB andI.I as it was interpreted rationally over the centuries by the popes and saints.
Image result for photo International Theological Commission

Image result for photo International Theological Commission

BOD, BOB and I.I today generally refer to visible and personally known non Catholics, saved outside the Catholic Church.So they are exceptions to EENS etc.This was the interpretation of Cardinal Ratzinger, Fr. Luiz Ladaria sj and Fr. Charles Morerod op, in two papers of the International Theological Commission.
Image result for photo International Theological Commission

So with BOD, BOB and I.I referring to visible and known non Catholics saved outside the Church there was a new Canon Law created in 1983 to support this error.
Image result for photo International Theological Commission

Since there are exceptions; invisible people are visible in the present times, the teaching of the popes of the past, on Protestants needing to convert into the Catholic Church for salvation, is obsolete.It is made obsolete with the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and Vatican Council II interpreted with Cushingism i.e invisible people are visible in the present times.
The excommunication of Orthodox Christians was lifted by Cushingite Pope Paul VI.Inter faith marriages were no more adultery and a mortal sin since it was assumed the non Catholic spouse could be saved outside the Church and did not need to convert.

Suicide is no more a mortal sin and a formal funeral Mass is offered for the deceased.Since it is assumed that the 'known exception' contradicts the rule.

Only God can know if someone in manifest mortal sin is an exception and will go to Heaven at the time of death but Amoris Laetitia of Pope Francis, suggests otherwise.

Now the divorced and remarried are being given the Eucharist as if there is a known exception to the rule.

Cardinal Walter Kasper said that if ecclesiology can be changed ( with Vatican Council II Cushingite) then why cannot the Eucharist be given to the divorced and re-married ?

The Amazon Synod Working Paper rejected exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church since there were alleged known exceptions to EENS.This same Cushingite theology will be used to justify new changes in the Church, to be announced next month according to Cardinal Hummes.

Hummes complained that the SSPX could not accept the Amazon Synod since they could not first accept Vatican Council II. He was referring to Vatican Council II Cushingite and not Vatican Council II Feeneyite. Hummes does not announce that he affirms Vatican Council II, Feeneyite.
Of course, the pope will refer to Vatican Council II. He means a Cushingite, Vatican Council II , with exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.

JOURNALISTS CAN ASK

Any journalist, could contact a cardinal and ask him to interpret Vatican Council II and magisterial documents with Feeneyism instead of Cushingism. He could choose to do so. But he will choose to remain irrational and insincere.I have spoken to bishops who would not comment. One said that this is a sensitive subject.

Any journalist, could point out to a cardinal that the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 made an objective mistake when it assumed BOD, BOB and I.I were exceptions to EENS. This is something obvious. The cardinal may agree but would not allow himself to be quoted?

How can Catholic professors of theology, at pontifical and secular universities in Rome and the rest of the world, remain academically unethical on this issue and not be challenged by journalists?