Offices of Inter-religious Dialogue, Ecumenism and Diocesan Pastoral Mission at the Rome Vicariate interpret Vatican Council II irrationally.This is dishonesty.

The Offices of Inter-religious Dialogue, Ecumenism and  Diocesan Pastoral Mission at the Rome Vicariate  interpret Vatican Council II irrationally.This is dishonesty.

Catholics at large are misled.May be  the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II is approved by the Mayor of Rome, Virgina Raggi.During dialogue, Mons.Marco Gnavi, the Director,of the Offices of Inter-religous Dialogue and ecumenism, confuses what is implicit as being explicit, unknown as being known and invisible as being visible.Then the Vicariate refers to the result of this irrational interpretation of the Council as ' a development of doctrine'. Obviously if a false premise is used there will be a radical 'development'.

The false premise is also used by the John Paul II Center for Interreligious Dialogue established in 2010  at the University of St. Thomas Aquinas, Rome.

This is also the false interpretation of Vatican Council II by the John XXIII Foundation for Religious Sciences (FSCIRE), the headquarters of the  "Bologna School".They have received another million euros in funding from the Italian government(2020-2022) according to reports by Sandro Magister(Settimo Cielo) and Juliana Freitag(Church Militant TV). 

It may be mentioned that Alberto Melloni, Church historian and director of the Foundation since 2007, interprets Vatican Council II with the common false premise and so there is an artifical rupture with the past exclusivist ecclesiology,an ecumenism of return and 16th century extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). There is no transparency on this issue from the  FSCIRE.

If it is known that Vatican Council II interpreted rationally is traditional on extra ecclesiam nulla salus,  he may not receive his millions from the government.1

Similarly Propagand Fide, Vatican distributes millions of euros annually to the pontficial universities  for students who interpret Vatican Council II  with this false reasoning.

Someone, needs to explain, to Matteo Salvini and the Lega political party, how Vatican Council II interpreted with or without a false premise, has a different conclusion.-Lionel Andrades

1

JANUARY 3, 2020

John XXIII Foundation for Religious Sciences (FSCIRE), the "Bologna School, interprets Vatican Council II with the common false premise.There is no transparency on this issue

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/john-xxiii-foundation-for-religious.html