Now there is a crisis for sedevacantist bishops Donald Sanborn and Mark Pivarunas in the USA since there sedevaantism was based upon Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally.There is also a crisis for the liberals like professor of theology, Robert Fastiggi at the Sacred Heart Major seminary, Detroit, USA.His liberalism was also based upon Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally.
For bishops Sanborn and Pivarunas LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc in Vatican Council II were exceptions to Feeneyite EENS. The baptism of desire(LG 14) and invincible ignorance(I.I) were exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).So they implied that these were visible non Catholics saved outside the Church in the present times.This was a false premise. If they were invisible they could not be exceptions in 2020.
But now we know that LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc are are only hypothetical cases. So the bishops used a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and then project the Council as a rupture with Tradition( Athanasius Creed etc).
Here is a citation from the CMRI website home page.
Theological Position: Sede Vacante
The Roman Catholic priests of the Religious Congregation of Mary Immaculate Queen profess and adhere to the Catholic Faith as it has been consistently
taught throughout the centuries since the time of Christ. With the death of Pope Pius XII and with the convocation of the Second Vatican Council, an unprecedented situation has befallen the Church, which threatens her very doctrines and worship.(Vatican Council II interpreted with and not without the false premise ) In order to provide for the preservation of the Catholic Faith and the traditional Holy Sacrifice of the Mass and Sacraments, the following statement has been drawn up for the purpose of clearly defining the actual position that these priests have taken.
I. VATICAN COUNCIL II: Convoked by John XXIII for the purpose of “updating” the Church, this council (held from 1962-65) decreed and implemented teachings which had been previously condemned by the Infallible Teaching Magisterium of the Church.(With the false premise there is a rupture with Tradition, which has been listed here.) The Second Vatican Council’s heretical teachings were primarily in the areas of religious liberty and false ecumenism. These were previously condemned by:
Pope Gregory XVI in Mirari Vos (1832)
Pope Pius IX in Quanta Cura and Syllabus of Errors (1864)
Pope Leo XIII in Immortale Dei (1865) and Libertas Humana (1888)
Pope Pius XI in Quas Primas (1925) and Mortalium Animos (1928)
Pope Pius XII in Mystici Corporis (1943)
(Without the false premise the Council does not contradict any of the above Magisterial documents )
THEREFORE, the Second Vatican Council is to be rejected as a false council because it has erred in its teachings on faith and morals.
Now we know that Vatican Council II can be interpreted without the false premise and there is no rupture with Tradition. So there is no basis for sedevacantism.
The two bishops criticized Fr. Leonard Feeney but now they know that without the false premise the Councils supports the strict interpretation of EENS, with no exceptions. The baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance were never exceptions to EENS.The Letter of the Holy Office 1949 made an objective mistake.
The two bishops do not want to affirm Feeneyite EENS and neither can they defend their sedevacantism before their supporters.
-Lionel Andrades
JULY 2, 2018
The Congregation of Mary Immaculate Queen(CMRI) needs to correct the error on their website and come out of the sedevacantism based on Vatican Council II.
JULY 1, 2018
Sedevacantism based upon the rejection of Vatican Council II is now obsolete ( Graphics) http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/07/sedevacantism-based-upon-rejection-of.html
JUNE 30, 2018
Bishops Schneider, Sanborn and Pivarunas contradict the Syllabus of Errors while the Catechisms of Trent and Pius X are a rupture with the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church for them
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/bishops-schneider-sanborn-and-pivarunas_30.html
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment