Actually, Bishop Athanasius Schneider, auxiliary bishop in Kazakhstan, might follow Viganò as Magister goes on to demonstrate. Schneider has also called for corrections in certain documents of Vatican II, specifically those that can be seen as the texts that corrected the Syllabus of Errors: Dignitatis humanae and Nostra aetate. These were the texts that caused Archbishop Michel Lefebvre to go into schism, and they continue to cause consternation for those who are dipping their toes into the schismatic waters. (For more on this issue, see my two-part review of Jesuit Fr. Jared Wicks' book Investigating Vatican II here and here.) - Michael Sean Winters,Who still stands with Viganò?
Even after being informed Michael Sean Winters continues with the propaganda on Vatican Council II. Fr. Jared Wicks sj interpreted Vatican Council II with the false premise and so there had to be a rupture with Catholic Tradition.
Secondly Winters mentions that Congard, Rahner and other liberals were present at Vatican Council II and so he implies that the Council is liberal.But even with the presence of Congar etc, the Council can be interpreted without the false premise and there will be no rupture with extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) as it was interpreted by the missionaries in the 16th century.
If Winters does not use the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II he would be affirming Feeneyite EENS.
So in his latest report he continues to quote Fr. Jared Wicks and ignores the false premise being used deceptively to project Vatican Council II as a rupture with Feeneyite EENS.
He is still lucky that Archbishop Carlo Vigano makes the same error as him.-Lionel Andrades
https://www.ncronline.org/news/opinion/distinctly-catholic/who-still-stands-vigan
_______________________________
_______________________________
JULY 18, 2020
NOVEMBER 20, 2019
The National Catholic Reporter cannot keep posting reviews of books on Vatican Council II, in which the authors make the same mistake ( Graphics )
-Lionel Andrades
NOVEMBER 20, 2019
NOVEMBER 20, 2019
The National Catholic Reporter reviews of the books by Fr. Jared Wicks sj and Prof. Paul Lakeland on Vatican Council II were flawed. The authors made a mistake ( Graphics) https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/the-national-catholic-reporter-reviews.html
__________________________________________
NOVEMBER 20, 2019
The National Catholic Reporter's reviews of the books by Fr. Jared Wicks sj and Prof. Paul Lakeland on Vatican Council II, were flawed.The authors had made a mistake. Vatican Council II was interpreted by them with false reasoning.The NCR must admit it. Both authors read the Council superficially.Then they assumed hypothetical cases were objective exceptions to the past ecclesiology of the Church. This is irrational. So the authors conclusions and those of the editors and correspondents of the NCR were irrational, non traditional and an artifical rupture with Catholic theology and doctrines on salvation etc.
NOVEMBER 20, 2019
Massimo Faggioli and Michael Sean Winters liberalism was based on an irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II.The National Catholic Reporter had two books reviewed, which interpreted Vatican Council II with the superficial and false reasoning.The books were authored by Paul Lakeland and Fr. Jared Wicks sj.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/massimo-faggiolis-and-michael-sean.html
AUGUST 8, 2018
OCTOBER 31, 2019
There are no arguements to support exceptions to EENS. There cannot be any objective exception, whatever is the argument
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment