Redemptoris Missio and Dominus Iesus, magisteial documents of Pope John Paul II and Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, were written, with Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS),interpreted with a false premise. So these documents are Christocentric and not ecclesiocentric.They are not Christocentric with an exclusivist ecclesiology. If Vatican Council II and EENS were interpreted without the false premise, these documents these documents could have the traditional ecclesiocentric ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.These documents are not Feeneyite but Cushingite and so there is a rupture with Tradition( Feeneyite EENS, Feeneyite Syllabus of Errors etc ).

Redemptoris Missio and Dominus Iesus, magisteial documents of Pope John Paul II and Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, were written, with Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS),interpreted  with a false premise. So these documents are Christocentric and not ecclesiocentric.They are not Christocentric with an exclusivist ecclesiology. 

If Vatican Council II and EENS were interpreted without the false premise, these documents  these documents could have the traditional ecclesiocentric  ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.These documents are not Feeneyite but Cushingite and so there is a rupture with Tradition( Feeneyite EENS, Feeneyite Syllabus of Errors etc ).

Do these documents reflect magisterial teaching or are they in error ?

According to Dominus Iesus  there must not be a separation between Jesus and the Church and yet this was done in Redemptoris Missio and Dominus Iesus itself. -Lionel Andrades