I have studied and taught the documents of the Council, some of them numerous times. I know them very well. Since I am a “Great Books” devotee and have always taught for Great Books schools, my theology courses would typically begin with Scripture and the Fathers, then go into the scholastics (especially St. Thomas) and finish up with magisterial texts: papal encyclicals and conciliar documents.
I often felt a sinking of the heart when the course reached a Vatican II document, such as Lumen Gentium, Sacrosanctum Concilium, Dignitatis Humanae, Unitatis Redintegratio, Nostra Aetate, or Gaudium et Spes. -Peter Kwasniewski
Lionel : The theology af the Great Books schools is Cushingite.They have to use the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and so create an artificial rupture with Feeneyite EENS to get an accreditation from the USCCB and the Vatican.
Kwasniewski could have interpreted Vatican Council II documents without the false premise and then affirm 16th century EENS like the missionaries of that time.
Now there is a rupture with St. Thomas Aquinas and the Church Fathers. This can still be avoided.-Lionel Andrades
https://onepeterfive.com/vigano-critique-council/
__________________________________
No comments:
Post a Comment