You don't need the SSPX approach any more since without the false premise you can affirm Tradition and also Vatican Council II. You don't need to reject Vatican Council II.This was not known to Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre.

 You don't need the SSPX approach any more since without the false premise you can affirm Tradition and also Vatican Council II. You don't need to reject Vatican Council II.This was not known to Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre.

I affirm the Syllabus of Errors ( Feeneyite), EENS ( Feeneyite) and the Athanasius Creed( all need the Catholic faith for salvation) along with hypothetical LG 8, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II. So there is nothing in the Council, for me, to contradict 16th century exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. 

So when it is said that it is obligatory to accept Vatican Council II, of course I accept it and would encourage all to say that they accept the Council, but only interpret it as I do, with the hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition. -Lionel Andrades