Jim Russell interprets Vatican Council II and the Letter of the Holy Office 1949(LOHO) with the false premise, accepts the non traditional Cushingite conclusion and then criticizes Fr. Leonard Feeney for not using the fake premise to interpret extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS)

 Jim Russell interprets Vatican Council II and the Letter of the Holy Office 1949(LOHO) with the false premise, accepts the non traditional Cushingite conclusion and then criticizes Fr. Leonard Feeney for not using the fake premise to interpret extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). He refers to 'The Strange Doctrines of Fr. Feeney'.Those who do not use the false premise and inference in Catholic theology are considered 'strange' and Church Militant TV supports him. -Lionel Andrades