Bishop Donald Sanborn and Prof. Robert Fastiggi will not answer THREE QUESTIONS.In their debate they both use the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II.
Without the false premise Bishop Sanborn could re-interpret Vatican Council II rationally and so does not have to reject the Council since it will not oppose Tradition. Similarly Prof. Fastiggi could re -interpret the Council rationally emerge a conservative with no option for his present liberalism. -Lionel Andrades
THREE QUESTIONS
1.How do you interpret Vatican Council II - with LG 8,LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc referring to explicit or implicit cases, objective or subjective cases, visible or invisible people in the present times ?
2.If LG 8,LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II are invisible, subjective and implicit, then LG 8 etc, in Vatican Council II, do not contradict the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors and exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church?
3.Do you support Tradition(exclusive salvation) and a rational interpretation of Vatican Council II ? -Lionel Andrades
________________________________
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment