Jim Russell and Michael Voris interpreted the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 (LOHO) and Vatican Council II with a false premise and then criticized Fr. Leonard Feeney for not doing the same. If they did not use the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and LOHO , there would be no rupture with Feeneyite EENS. Vatican Council II really supports the strict interpretation of EENS when the false premise is not used to interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc

 Jim Russell and Michael Voris interpreted the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 (LOHO)  and Vatican Council II with a false premise and then criticized Fr. Leonard Feeney for not doing the same. If they did not use the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and LOHO , there would be no rupture with Feeneyite EENS. Vatican Council II really supports the strict interpretation of EENS when the false premise is not used to interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc. -:Lionel Andrades

APRIL 24, 2019

Jim Russell on Church Militant TV does not refer to hundreds of reports on line saying there are no practical cases of BOD, BOB and I.I. : St. Benedict Center's theological position

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/04/jim-russell-does-refer-to-hundreds-of.html